From: Bit Twister on 22 Mar 2010 22:05 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:06:44 +0100, J G Miller wrote: > > This is a Usenet news group. More correctly, comp.unix.shell would be the Usenet group to ask scripting questions. :) > Are you not able to use e-mail for personal messages Heheheh, If you were to ping my email domain seen in the header you would have the answer to that question. > and software support? That would be a good point when posting in comp.unix.shell. Ohmster will need to post what he tried and show the results of the command that failed. Not just show script and output. :( Just asking for code to do his job will pretty much get him into subject matter expert's kill files.
From: Bit Twister on 22 Mar 2010 22:18 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:47:51 -0500, Ohmster wrote: > > Guys, is it me or is there anything in here that someone can spot that > would cause a double </A> tag in the generated urls like I am getting? Ask yourself, are there any </A> tags in the script? What happens if I remove them? > My > problem is that this, IMHO, is great stuff but I am not educated or > experienced enough to manipulate it as of yet, or at least not very much. Well, it is not that hard of a script to figure out when you understand the commands. set -- $_line <=== breaks the line down into command line arguments. if you were to do a man shift you would get a hint as to look next. Then doing a man bash and using the search command /shift \ you would understand what that does. > > I would love to get that ".url" out of the link name too. That would be either a "Strip shortest match of $substring from back of $string" seen in http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/refcards.html#AEN22102 under Table B-5. String Operations Or maybe you need location and use other substring operations to tear out the offending character string. > Bit Twister, anybody? Understand this script enough to figure out what is > making the extra close address tag and how to clean that ".url" out of the > link name? Do read the "Meaning" section of http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/refcards.html#AEN22102
From: Bit Twister on 22 Mar 2010 22:20 On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:18:35 +0000 (UTC), Bit Twister wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:47:51 -0500, Ohmster wrote: > if you were to do a > man shift > you would get a hint as to look next. Then doing a > man bash > and using the search command > /shift \ > you would understand what that does. Dang, search command should have been /shift \[
From: Ohmster on 22 Mar 2010 22:26 Bit Twister <BitTwister(a)mouse-potato.com> wrote in news:slrnhqg8fe.g9h.BitTwister(a)cooker.home.test: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:06:44 +0100, J G Miller wrote: >> >> This is a Usenet news group. > > More correctly, comp.unix.shell would be the Usenet group to ask > scripting questions. :) Agreed. I have it in my subscribed list. Do you frequent the newsgroup? Might be best to move the discussion there, depends on if this will be a quick matter or not. I will read your next message and make that determination. >> Are you not able to use e-mail for personal messages > > Heheheh, If you were to ping my email domain seen in the header you > would have the answer to that question. Probably fake, let's see... [ohmster(a)ohmster scripts]$ ping mouse-potato.com PING mouse-potato.com (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.138 ms 64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.130 ms ....what? localhost? How did you do that? [ohmster(a)ohmster scripts]$ ping yahoo.com PING yahoo.com (69.147.125.65) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from ir1.fp.vip.re1.yahoo.com (69.147.125.65): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=61.4 ms 64 bytes from ir1.fp.vip.re1.yahoo.com (69.147.125.65): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=42.1 ms 64 bytes from ir1.fp.vip.re1.yahoo.com (69.147.125.65): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=42.3 ms ....must be some inside linux joke, lemmie do that mouse-potato thing from an MS CLI... C:\Users\Paul>ping mouse-potato.com Pinging mouse-potato.com [127.0.0.1] with 32 byt Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Got me on that one. Inside computer joke I would say. Maybe a throwback "from the old days of programming" or something. Good one though. :) >> and software support? > > That would be a good point when posting in comp.unix.shell. > > Ohmster will need to post what he tried and show the results of the > command that failed. Not just show script and output. :( > > Just asking for code to do his job will pretty much get him into > subject matter expert's kill files. Yes it will. I was afraid someone would mistake me for a school kid trying to get his homework done for free but at least you know me and gave me a real answer. John and Michel did too, thanks guys. -- ~Ohmster | ohmster59 /a/t/ gmail dot com Put "messageforohmster" in message body (That is Message Body, not Subject!) to pass my spam filter.
From: Bit Twister on 22 Mar 2010 22:41 On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:26:37 -0500, Ohmster wrote: > > ...must be some inside linux joke, No, just a feature of how the Internet works. > lemmie do that mouse-potato thing from > an MS CLI... > > C:\Users\Paul>ping mouse-potato.com > > Pinging mouse-potato.com [127.0.0.1] with 32 byt > Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 > > Got me on that one. Inside computer joke I would say. Maybe a throwback > "from the old days of programming" or something. Good one though. :) No, mouse-potato.com is a registered domain. Not by me by the way. Do a whois mouse-potato.com
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: using the Find command Next: Linux PHP 5 & Maiman || charset fundamentals [Expert] |