From: Tim Wescott on
On 07/04/2010 08:26 PM, Muzaffer Kal wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:34:19 -0700, Tim Wescott<tim(a)seemywebsite.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2010 05:59 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:29:05 -0700, Tim Wescott<tim(a)seemywebsite.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just did a quick survey of Digi-Key and Mouser -- it looks like
>>>> silicon gyros are still in the $5 - $10/ea range, unless of course you
>>>> want to spend more. Anyone know of less expensive alternatives? Ditto
>>>> accelerometers?
>>>
>>> In the late '80's I was working at Sperry on chips for Fiber Optic
>>> Gyros (FOG's) that were supposed to be so cheap that they could be
>>> used in cars. In fact, at one point in the development, we had a demo
>>> presented to us by Toyota.
>>>
>>> I've lost touch with that end of business... do FOG's still exist?
>>
>> Yes they do, but the least expensive ones are probably $500 to $1000,
>> with prices going up from there until they intersect with prices for
>> ring laser gyros (out of my league -- I suspect $100000, but I could be
>> off by almost an order of magnitude).
>>
>> I suppose you could build a FOG for a few bucks in quantity, but there's
>> a whole lot of tweaking and tuning that you wouldn't be able to do,
>> never mind the fact that winding the fiber onto a bobbin then
>> terminating it is going to have no end of yield issues. When you were
>> done, you'd probably have something that cost a whole lot more than a
>> similar performance silicon or quartz MEMS.
>>
>> AFAIK, the gyro biz kind of goes like this:
>>
>> order of M: | | | | |
>> silicon MEMS: ***************
>> quartz MEMS: ***************
>> mechanical: ****************************************
>> FOG: *********************************
>> Ring laser: ******************
>>
>> You pays your money and you gets what you pays for.
>
> Actually ring laser ones are not that expensive. I think this one at 1
> degree/s is only around $15K :
> http://www.honeywell.com/sites/servlet/com.merx.npoint.servlets.DocumentServlet?docid=D7B652202-0601-F56B-1B7F-829F1A7109E4

I _did_ say I could be off by a factor of 10!

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Do you need to implement control loops in software?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" was written for you.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
From: Tim Wescott on
On 07/04/2010 08:56 PM, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:26:52 -0700, the renowned Muzaffer Kal
> <kal(a)dspia.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:34:19 -0700, Tim Wescott<tim(a)seemywebsite.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/04/2010 05:59 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:29:05 -0700, Tim Wescott<tim(a)seemywebsite.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just did a quick survey of Digi-Key and Mouser -- it looks like
>>>>> silicon gyros are still in the $5 - $10/ea range, unless of course you
>>>>> want to spend more. Anyone know of less expensive alternatives? Ditto
>>>>> accelerometers?
>>>>
>>>> In the late '80's I was working at Sperry on chips for Fiber Optic
>>>> Gyros (FOG's) that were supposed to be so cheap that they could be
>>>> used in cars. In fact, at one point in the development, we had a demo
>>>> presented to us by Toyota.
>>>>
>>>> I've lost touch with that end of business... do FOG's still exist?
>>>
>>> Yes they do, but the least expensive ones are probably $500 to $1000,
>>> with prices going up from there until they intersect with prices for
>>> ring laser gyros (out of my league -- I suspect $100000, but I could be
>>> off by almost an order of magnitude).
>>>
>>> I suppose you could build a FOG for a few bucks in quantity, but there's
>>> a whole lot of tweaking and tuning that you wouldn't be able to do,
>>> never mind the fact that winding the fiber onto a bobbin then
>>> terminating it is going to have no end of yield issues. When you were
>>> done, you'd probably have something that cost a whole lot more than a
>>> similar performance silicon or quartz MEMS.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, the gyro biz kind of goes like this:
>>>
>>> order of M: | | | | |
>>> silicon MEMS: ***************
>>> quartz MEMS: ***************
>>> mechanical: ****************************************
>>> FOG: *********************************
>>> Ring laser: ******************
>>>
>>> You pays your money and you gets what you pays for.
>>
>> Actually ring laser ones are not that expensive. I think this one at 1
>> degree/s is only around $15K :
>> http://www.honeywell.com/sites/servlet/com.merx.npoint.servlets.DocumentServlet?docid=D7B652202-0601-F56B-1B7F-829F1A7109E4
>
> That's an entire 6 DOF IMU- 3 accelerometers and 3 gyros.
>
> "Export licensing restricts operation to a maximum of 18,288 meters
> and 514 meters per second"

I.e. don't buy it to put into your best cousin Ahmed's SCUD missile.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Do you need to implement control loops in software?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" was written for you.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
From: Nunya on
On Jul 4, 5:29 pm, Tim Wescott <t...(a)seemywebsite.com> wrote:
> I just did a quick survey of Digi-Key and Mouser -- it looks like
> silicon gyros are still in the $5 - $10/ea range, unless of course you
> want to spend more.  Anyone know of less expensive alternatives?  Ditto
> accelerometers?
>
> --
>
> Tim Wescott
> Wescott Design Serviceshttp://www.wescottdesign.com
>
> Do you need to implement control loops in software?
> "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" was written for you.
> See details athttp://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html

The Inertial Reference device that we buy from GE runs about $50k
each.
It is about an 8 inch cube and the hi-res GPS antenna gets remotely
mounted from it.
Works great for keeping a dish pointed at its bird in a mobile setting.