Prev: FW: Unable to install PostgreSQL on Windows Server2003 SP2
Next: [HACKERS] Probably badly timed suggestion: pl/perl calling style same as Cstyle
From: Tom Lane on 24 Feb 2010 16:23
There is a failure report here that seems worthy of notice:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=baiji&dt=2010-02-23%2023:00:03

Everything is fine except that the session running the "triggers" test
went completely bonkers: the first few commands are okay, and then
after that everything fails with

ERROR: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662

2662 is pg_class_oid_index, so this basically means that relcache loads
are failing, which renders it not surprising that nothing works.

However, the concurrent test sessions are okay, and so are the following
ones except for some diffs arising from the trigger test's failure to
add or remove some tables once it had got broken. So only the one
backend went nuts. This leads to the conclusion that either the
breakage was purely internal to that backend's relcache, or else there
was a very transient broken state in the system catalogs that no other
backend was unlucky enough to see.

The triggers test runs in parallel with the vacuum test, which as of
a few weeks ago executes a "VACUUM FULL pg_class". My gut tells me
that that's related somehow, but on the other hand maybe this was just
random cosmic rays or something. We are talking about a Vista machine
after all.

I don't recall having seen anything like this elsewhere. Does anyone
else?

BTW, this is a good example of why letting the buildfarm sit broken
for any length of time is a bad idea: I very nearly didn't see this
failure at all, because I assumed it was just another instance of the
fsync-related issues. Maybe we should have a stricter policy about
backing out known-broken patches rather than letting them pollute
buildfarm results for awhile.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: FW: Unable to install PostgreSQL on Windows Server2003 SP2
Next: [HACKERS] Probably badly timed suggestion: pl/perl calling style same as Cstyle