Prev: Does parallel make require guards against duplicateactions?
Next: We no longer have a fallback for machines withoutworking int64
From: Tom Lane on 5 Jan 2010 10:47
As pointed out here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php
the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working
int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest
of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to
have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear
that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver,
for whom I have little sympathy anyway.)

Thoughts? Is it worth expending any energy on?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Does parallel make require guards against duplicateactions?
Next: We no longer have a fallback for machines withoutworking int64