Prev: [HACKERS] Timezone matching script (win32)
Next: How to generate specific WAL records?
From: Jaime Casanova on 13 Apr 2010 11:41
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(a)systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
>
> another point, what happened with this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1229549172.4793.105.camel(a)ebony..2ndQuadrant?
> Obviously we still have the problem with hash indexes, and in that
> thread Tom advice was just to document the issue and while that could
> be fine at least we should be emitting better messages, consider this
> one that i got on the standby server (where 4658650 is the oid of a
> hash index):
> """
> mic=# explain analyze select * from tt1 where col1 = 5000;
> ERROR:  could not read block 0 in file "base/21958/4658650": read only
> 0 of 8192 bytes
> """
>

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [HACKERS] Timezone matching script (win32)
Next: How to generate specific WAL records?