Prev: [HACKERS] Synchronization levels in SR
Next: [HACKERS] Clearing psql's input buffer after auto-reconnect
From: Alex Goncharov on 24 May 2010 12:25 I have some libpq-using application code, in which fetching the data follows this logic (after a statement has been prepared): ---------------------------------------- PQexecPrepared(pg_result, pg_conn, pg_statement_name, input_param_cnt, param_values, param_lengths, param_formats, result_format); PQntuples(&rows_in_result, pg_result); /* The application provides storage so that I can pass a certain number of rows * (rows_to_pass_up) to the caller, and I repeat the following loop until * many rows_to_pass_up cover all the rows_in_result (pg_row_num_base keeps the track * of where I am in the process. */ for (int row_idx = 0; row_idx < rows_to_pass_up; ++row_idx) { const int pg_row_number = row_idx + pg_row_num_base; for (int pg_column_number = 0; pg_column_number < result_column_cnt_ ++pg_column_number) { PQgetvalue(&value, pg_result, pg_row_number, pg_column_number); PQgetlength(&length, pg_result, pg_row_number, pg_column_number); } } ---------------------------------------- My question is: am I doing the right thing from the "data size being passed from BE to FE" perspective? The code in `bin/psql' relies on the value of the FETCH_COUNT parameter to build an appropriate fetch forward FETCH_COUNT from _psql_cursor command. No equivalent of FETCH_COUNT is available at the libpq level, so I assume that the interface I am using is smart enough not to send gigabytes of data to FE. Is that right? Is the logic I am using safe and good? Where does the result set (GBs of data) reside after I call PQexecPrepared? On BE, I hope? Thanks, -- Alex -- alex-goncharov(a)comcast.net -- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |