From: "Joshua D. Drake" on 23 Jul 2010 14:48 Hello, I am writing a blog on backups with postgresql, which I plan at some point (if someone doesn't beat me to it) on turning into a patch for the docs but I found this inconsistency: The docs state that: "In particular, it must have read access to all tables that you want to back up, so in practice you almost always have to run it as a database superuser." Ignoring the fact that databases have a lot more objects than tables, there is no READ/SELECT permission for functions. Thus in order to backup a function, I must have EXECUTE permissions on the function. Further if I don't have EXECUTE permissions I can still see the function in pg_proc. This seems like an inconsistency worth looking into, especially now that we have per column perms. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Next: permission inconsistency with functions |