From: Chiara LONG on
currently i'm workng on the minimization of:
sum(x)sum(t)[Observations(x,t)-alfa-Ft-beta*exp(a*x)*Ft^2]^2

there're 2296 observations for x(41)*t(56)

where a* is known, the optimization is performed with respect to alfa, beta, Ft, t varying.

Ft as a factor value with t varying, should I estimate it as a parameter here(so in total 58 parameters :-S) or there can be a much simpler way to do it?

Thank you so so much!!!
From: John D'Errico on
"Chiara LONG" <dragenius(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message <hrsq31$ppe$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> currently i'm workng on the minimization of:
> sum(x)sum(t)[Observations(x,t)-alfa-Ft-beta*exp(a*x)*Ft^2]^2
>
> there're 2296 observations for x(41)*t(56)
>
> where a* is known, the optimization is performed with respect to alfa, beta, Ft, t varying.
>
> Ft as a factor value with t varying, should I estimate it as a parameter here(so in total 58 parameters :-S) or there can be a much simpler way to do it?
>
> Thank you so so much!!!

You cannot estimate these parameters uniquely. This
is why you may be having a problem doing the
estimation. It will fail to converge to a consistent
value, even if the solver does terminate.

John