Prev: Set theory operators compared to Algebra operators #543 Correcting Math
Next: proof involving FTC to double integral
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 28 Mar 2010 16:35
"Perverse 19 mathermatics" <dope666(a)verizon.net> writes:

> "Inverse 19 mathematics" <hope9900(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:37426c15-dab1-4a4a-ba00-0a906492de5a(a)q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> With the complete method of placing and identifying all prime
>> numbers without exceoption
>
> Learn how to spell 'exception', fuckwit.
>
>> in sets of 36 within the paragon of 19, we
>
> 36 and 19 aren't numbers, fuckwit.

I gotta tell ya, when I read this, I just think to myself how
intelligent and superior you seem. Spot on, dude!

--
"Now I realize that he got away with all of that because sci.math is
not important, and the rest of the world doesn't pay attention.
Like, no one is worried about football players reading sci.math
postings!" -- James S. Harris on jock reading habits
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Set theory operators compared to Algebra operators #543 Correcting Math
Next: proof involving FTC to double integral