Prev: Band GAP energy
Next: Physicists Find Way to See Through Paint, Paper, and Other Opaque Materials
From: Urion on 16 Mar 2010 14:00 I've never completely bought into the theory of general relativity. General relativity poses more questions than it attempts to answer. First why do mass-energy curve spacetime? What is spacetime really made of and how is it different from the ether? Why is there no spacetime without mass-energy? All these questions need answers and currently general relativty only generates more problems. I think quantum mechanics is a more accurate theory than general relativity because QM has generated applications like photonics, quantum optics, quantum information, quantum computing etc. General relativity so far has not generated any technological applications.
From: Dono. on 16 Mar 2010 14:03 On Mar 16, 11:00 am, Urion <blackman_...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > General relativity so far has not generated any >technological applications. How about GPS?
From: Urion on 16 Mar 2010 14:08 I've never completely bought into the theory of general relativity. General relativity poses more questions than it attempts to answer. First why do mass-energy curve spacetime? What is spacetime except as a mathematical construct really made of and how is it different from the ether? Why is there no spacetime without mass-energy? All these questions need answers and currently general relativty only generates more problems like dark matter and dark energy.
From: jimp on 16 Mar 2010 15:05 In sci.physics Urion <blackman_two(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I've never completely bought into the theory of general relativity. The universe could care less what you believe. > All these questions need answers and currently general relativty only > generates more problems. You mean like early in the history of aerodynamics when people started building things that went supersonic? What you're after is called instant gratification. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply.
From: J. Clarke on 16 Mar 2010 16:15 On 3/16/2010 2:08 PM, Urion wrote: > I've never completely bought into the theory of general relativity. > > General relativity poses more questions than it attempts to answer. > First why do mass-energy curve spacetime? What is spacetime except as > a mathematical construct really made of and how is it different from > the ether? Why is there no spacetime without mass-energy? > > All these questions need answers and currently general relativty only > generates more problems like dark matter and dark energy. So how do you explain everything that GR explains? >
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Band GAP energy Next: Physicists Find Way to See Through Paint, Paper, and Other Opaque Materials |