From: PremiumBlend on
On Dec 17, 11:22 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 16, 5:49 pm, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 10:23 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 14, 6:02 am, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hello,
>
> > > > How would I use a CHOOSE box instead of a label
> > > > inside of a field specifier? For example:
>
> > > > \<< "CIRCULAR CURVE SOLVER"
> > > > { "RADIUS =" "ARC ="} { 1 1 }
> > > > { NOVAL NOVAL } { NOVAL NOVAL }
> > > > \>>
>
> > > > I would like the first field specifier
> > > > to be:
>
> > > > \<< "1ST PARAMETER:"
> > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > \>>
>
> > > > Second field specifier:
>
> > > > \<< "2ND PARAMETER:"
> > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > \>>
>
> > > > Regards,
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > Hello Mark
>
> > > This is the exactly same problem that I came across a couple of months
> > > ago. I was thinking of having choose field which could make me to
> > > choose from different options indicating that I should have four
> > > fields, two choose and two text which is only possible in System RPL.
> > > I made a Horizontal Curve Solver in which the first choose field
> > > consisted of just "Radius" and "Delta" with a text field in front of
> > > it whereas the other choose field consisted of "Delta", "Arc Length",
> > > "Chord Length", "Tangent", "Mid-ordinate" and "External" and again a
> > > text field along with it. This offers quite a few combinations and
> > > moreover, the programming part of interpreting what the user selected
> > > is not that bad either.
>
> > > Regards,
>
> > > Gurveer- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Thanks for the reply! If you ever used the TDS
> > Survey card, you probably liked the way the
> > program handled the text fields. For every press
> > of the right cursor key you were presented with
> > a different option for the current highlighted
> > field.
>
> Unfortunately, I haven't ever! Is that something which works on these
> HP calculators?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The program was written for the HP 48SX/GX.
From: Gurveer on
On Dec 17, 4:15 pm, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 11:22 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 5:49 pm, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 15, 10:23 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 14, 6:02 am, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hello,
>
> > > > > How would I use a CHOOSE box instead of a label
> > > > > inside of a field specifier? For example:
>
> > > > > \<< "CIRCULAR CURVE SOLVER"
> > > > > { "RADIUS =" "ARC ="} { 1 1 }
> > > > > { NOVAL NOVAL } { NOVAL NOVAL }
> > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > I would like the first field specifier
> > > > > to be:
>
> > > > > \<< "1ST PARAMETER:"
> > > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > Second field specifier:
>
> > > > > \<< "2ND PARAMETER:"
> > > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > Regards,
>
> > > > > Mark
>
> > > > Hello Mark
>
> > > > This is the exactly same problem that I came across a couple of months
> > > > ago. I was thinking of having choose field which could make me to
> > > > choose from different options indicating that I should have four
> > > > fields, two choose and two text which is only possible in System RPL.
> > > > I made a Horizontal Curve Solver in which the first choose field
> > > > consisted of just "Radius" and "Delta" with a text field in front of
> > > > it whereas the other choose field consisted of "Delta", "Arc Length",
> > > > "Chord Length", "Tangent", "Mid-ordinate" and "External" and again a
> > > > text field along with it. This offers quite a few combinations and
> > > > moreover, the programming part of interpreting what the user selected
> > > > is not that bad either.
>
> > > > Regards,
>
> > > > Gurveer- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Thanks for the reply! If you ever used the TDS
> > > Survey card, you probably liked the way the
> > > program handled the text fields. For every press
> > > of the right cursor key you were presented with
> > > a different option for the current highlighted
> > > field.
>
> > Unfortunately, I haven't ever! Is that something which works on these
> > HP calculators?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> The program was written for the HP 48SX/GX.

Are there any packages like that for HP 50g? I know most of the stuff
is done on the collector or gun itself but just curious to know if
these calculators are still preferred in the field by surveyors.
From: elturco on
On Dec 18, 2:35 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 4:15 pm, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 17, 11:22 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 16, 5:49 pm, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 15, 10:23 am, Gurveer <gurveer....(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 14, 6:02 am, PremiumBlend <mnhollin...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Hello,
>
> > > > > > How would I use a CHOOSE box instead of a label
> > > > > > inside of a field specifier? For example:
>
> > > > > > \<< "CIRCULAR CURVE SOLVER"
> > > > > > { "RADIUS =" "ARC ="} { 1 1 }
> > > > > > { NOVAL NOVAL } { NOVAL NOVAL }
> > > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > > I would like the first field specifier
> > > > > > to be:
>
> > > > > > \<< "1ST PARAMETER:"
> > > > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > > Second field specifier:
>
> > > > > > \<< "2ND PARAMETER:"
> > > > > > { "RADIUS" "DELTA" "ARC" "TANGENT" }
> > > > > > 1 CHOOSE
> > > > > > \>>
>
> > > > > > Regards,
>
> > > > > > Mark
>
> > > > > Hello Mark
>
> > > > > This is the exactly same problem that I came across a couple of months
> > > > > ago. I was thinking of having choose field which could make me to
> > > > > choose from different options indicating that I should have four
> > > > > fields, two choose and two text which is only possible in System RPL.
> > > > > I made a Horizontal Curve Solver in which the first choose field
> > > > > consisted of just "Radius" and "Delta" with a text field in front of
> > > > > it whereas the other choose field consisted of "Delta", "Arc Length",
> > > > > "Chord Length", "Tangent", "Mid-ordinate" and "External" and again a
> > > > > text field along with it. This offers quite a few combinations and
> > > > > moreover, the programming part of interpreting what the user selected
> > > > > is not that bad either.
>
> > > > > Regards,
>
> > > > > Gurveer- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Thanks for the reply! If you ever used the TDS
> > > > Survey card, you probably liked the way the
> > > > program handled the text fields. For every press
> > > > of the right cursor key you were presented with
> > > > a different option for the current highlighted
> > > > field.
>
> > > Unfortunately, I haven't ever! Is that something which works on these
> > > HP calculators?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > The program was written for the HP 48SX/GX.
>
> Are there any packages like that for HP 50g? I know most of the stuff
> is done on the collector or gun itself but just curious to know if
> these calculators are still preferred in the field by surveyors.

I must say I still prefer the 48gx programmed by myself, it just do
what I want, including the way it collects the data,
the TDS was good enough and now it's some software for the hp50 that
comes with a bluetooth interface,
I never used it but it looks very nice.
Take a look at this:
http://www.stakemill.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1618
From: Katie on
> I must say I still prefer the 48gx programmed by myself, it just do
> what I want, including the way it collects the data,
> the TDS was good enough and now it's some software for the hp50 that
> comes with a bluetooth interface,
> I never used it but it looks very nice.
> Take a look at this:http://www.stakemill.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id...

Not sure if I was reading that right, but the dc50 software has
nothing to do with the TeDiuS software from the 48 time. I should know
since I wrote it. . . :-)

I am no longer part of that company as I work for HP now, but if you
send an email to sales(a)pssllc.com John could very easily hook you up
with a demo if interested.

TW

From: Gurveer on
On Dec 18, 8:21 am, Katie <kjeanne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I must say I still prefer the 48gx programmed by myself, it just do
> > what I want, including the way it collects the data,
> > the TDS was good enough and now it's some software for the hp50 that
> > comes with a bluetooth interface,
> > I never used it but it looks very nice.
> > Take a look at this:http://www.stakemill.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id...
>
> Not sure if I was reading that right, but the dc50 software has
> nothing to do with the TeDiuS software from the 48 time. I should know
> since I wrote it. . . :-)
>
> I am no longer part of that company as I work for HP now, but if you
> send an email to sales(a)pssllc.com John could very easily hook you up
> with a demo if interested.
>
> TW

That's super cool. Thanks a lot! Of course, I'm interested and look
forward to that.

Regards,

Gurveer