From: Arno Wagner on 24 Dec 2008 06:09 In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc Frantisek.Rysanek(a)post.cz wrote: > On 2 Pro, 13:45, Frantisek.Rysa...(a)post.cz wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I've tried to attach an old HP LaserJet III to a modern notebook PC >> using a cheap USB-to-LPT dongle. I used the generic USB printing >> support (driver for the dongle) in XP, installed a HP LJ III printer >> manually (the stock XP driver) and pointed the printer profile to use >> the virtual USB printing port. >> >> The first result is, that it just doesn't work. The printing subsystem >> in Windows keeps trying something for a while, then merely says that >> the printing failed. >> >> I am aware that maybe the stock XP driver still relies on physical LPT >> hardware (or on LPT hardware-specific low-level driver in XP). >> >> There's also a slight chance of some hardware mismatch (logic levels >> mismatch, LPT/USB dongle under-powered, fuzzy PSU rails inside the >> dongle etc). The dongle is based on this chip (Prolific PL2305):http://www.prolific.com.tw/support/files/%5CIO%20Cable%5CPL-2305%5CDo... >> The USB device is clearly alive - the dongle is detected by the XP OS >> and the generic USB printing support driver gets loaded. >> >> Do you have any explicit experience/knowledge that this should / >> should not work? >> >> In the past, I've been into various printing tricks: redirecting the >> print jobs to a file, to a network printer via Samba or LPR (Microsoft >> built-in or 3rd-party spooler), to a local XP-borne GhostScript >> installation... I'm pretty sure I could redirect the HP LJ III >> driver's output harmlessly into some sort of common "virtual pipe" >> along those lines - and then maybe forward the traffic back to the USB >> device by some other means. >> >> At a first attempt, I can see that the USB device doesn't respond to >> the PRN or LPT device names. Is there any way to reach the USB printer >> port by some common device name from the Windows command line? Or, for >> that matter, a simple way to open the raw USB LPT port from Windows >> user space programmatically, via the Win32 API? >> >> At the hardware level, I don't think the LJ III would use some non- >> standard signaling, that would require direct software access to the >> LPT hardware. Quite the contrary - to me, the LJ III is a "mother of >> all printers", a reference printer implementation. If you attach just >> anything to its Centronics port and start sending bytes of data, using >> the Strobe and Busy signals in a vaguely standard way, you just have >> to get some output :-) I would expect that any USB/LPT converter >> provides at least this much. >> >> Any ideas are welcome :-) >> >> FrankRysanek > Thanks to all who replied... First of all, the bit of information > about Prolific 2305, that was a misinformation - not true - courtesy > of the dongle vendor. Now I can't find that note on their web site > anymore. The actual chip used on the inside is a WinChipHead CH340S > (or so the label says) - although by function and pinout it would more > closely resemble a CH341. > It shows some signs of life both in Windows and in Linux (usblp.c) - I > do get some data printed on paper, fairly garbled (the Windows test > page). It seems as if the dongle expects bidirectional communication, > but reading back the printer status somehow always fails. Both Windows > and Linux throw error messages along those lines. > It fails exactly the same way with LaserJet III and LaserJet 6P. > I've even tried improving power rail filtering inside the dongle, to > no avail. Sounds like a parial or broken implementation of the parallel port in the dongle. > I've posted a more detailed request for help to linux- > usb(a)vger.kernel.org. If those gurus don't help (I hope they don't > blacklist me right away for offtopic questions), I guess hardly anyone > else can help me :-) Good idea. They will not blacklist you typically, but they might lfame you. Handle that like any good flaming, just ignore it. Arno
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Canon i860 printer 3e ink empty in few hours Next: Printing on toilet paper |