From: Fujii Masao on
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(a)mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this
>> from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection?
>>
>
> Does smart shutdown still fail to shut down a slave?

Yes. More precisely, smart shutdown during recovery does not complete
until recovery ends.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Robert Haas on
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(a)mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this
>>> from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection?
>>>
>>
>> Does smart shutdown still fail to shut down a slave?
>
> Yes. More precisely, smart shutdown during recovery does not complete
> until recovery ends.

Well, I don't think we should let smart shutdown just never terminate
when standby_mode = on. That's really a minefield for the unwary. I
think we either need to make it work, or somehow give the user an
error that says "try a different shutdown mode".

....Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Greg Stark on
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes. More precisely, smart shutdown during recovery does not complete
>> until recovery ends.
>
> Well, I don't think we should let smart shutdown just never terminate
> when standby_mode = on.  That's really a minefield for the unwary.  I
> think we either need to make it work, or somehow give the user an
> error that says "try a different shutdown mode".

It also seems dangerous to let someone think they have a standby
database ready to go and the minute they need it -- it shuts down....


--
greg

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Robert Haas on
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(a)mit.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. More precisely, smart shutdown during recovery does not complete
>>> until recovery ends.
>>
>> Well, I don't think we should let smart shutdown just never terminate
>> when standby_mode = on.  That's really a minefield for the unwary.  I
>> think we either need to make it work, or somehow give the user an
>> error that says "try a different shutdown mode".
>
> It also seems dangerous to let someone think they have a standby
> database ready to go and the minute they need it -- it shuts down....

LOL.

Yeah, that would not be cool.

....Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: [HACKERS] HS/SR and smart shutdown
Next: plpython3 perf