Prev: BD troll
Next: DHL Trojan email
From: ~BD~ on 25 Apr 2010 12:46 David Kaye wrote: > "Peter Foldes"<bounce(a)bounce> wrote: >> Tell me David. What was the purpose of this post of yours. Your whole post is >> looking very strongly as Trolling > > It would be nice if all of you would re-title this post. It has never been > about me, so I have no idea why my name is being dragged into it. > I originally said ........ Maybe someone like David Kaye has the experience to determine if a machine *is* - actually - *clean* /after/ installing and running MBAM. Someone, surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely used facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for the downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned machine? It seems my comment to this effect, on TRT's blog, resulted in my being banned from the Malwarebytes forums! Ref:- https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8261578886161919944&postID=2398537603557873401 Where I posted a comment, thus:- "I have been researching malware for over four years now (as a user, not a guru!) and I now wonder how sure one can be that Malwarebytes is run by /good/ guys. What a super ruse it would be - to clear a machine of everyone else's 'nasties' but then, perhaps, leave their own package installed on the user's machine. No one would ever suspect, would they? Cybercrime has risen exponentially since Malwarebytes was first founded in 2004. See: http://www.malwarebytes.org/about.php It's probably just a coincidence, eh?!! ;-) ***** Why a ban - when ridicule would have done? Hey! -- Dave - have I ruffled feathers again?
From: Leo on 25 Apr 2010 18:13 Stop your lies! It has been clearly proven on Scorched Earth that you were banned at the Malwarebytes forums for posting an obscene photo. -- LEO Don't confuse having a career with having a life. They're not the same "~BD~" <BoaterDave(a)hotmail.co.ukk> wrote in message news:oKydnc_RHotP7EnWnZ2dnUVZ7sOdnZ2d(a)bt.com... Someone, surely, has carried out an independent check to give such a widely used facility a clean bill of health. Whilst MBAM is obviously highly effective at removing 'malware' why is it considered impossible for the downloaded software to leave its *own* gremlin within the cleaned machine? It seems my comment to this effect, on TRT's blog, resulted in my being banned from the Malwarebytes forums!
From: David Kaye on 26 Apr 2010 16:07 I guess I do have the expertise. A guy with a networking problem was doing some research on Google and came across the various posts labeled "David Kaye" and decided to write me back. We spoke on the phone. He operates a real estate office in the SF area and needs some tech help. We came to some fair terms and I'll be working on his project Wednesday. They say that all publicity is good publicity. I'm not sure if that's true, but I'm happy that he took a chance on me. So, I guess I'm saying I don't care if you plaster my name all over Usenet. It gets me business. Of course, it doesn't hurt that I have a long list of satisfied customers he was able to check, too.
From: David H. Lipman on 26 Apr 2010 16:34 From: "David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2(a)yahoo.com> | I guess I do have the expertise. A guy with a networking problem was doing | some research on Google and came across the various posts labeled "David Kaye" | and decided to write me back. We spoke on the phone. He operates a real | estate office in the SF area and needs some tech help. We came to some fair | terms and I'll be working on his project Wednesday. | They say that all publicity is good publicity. I'm not sure if that's true, | but I'm happy that he took a chance on me. | So, I guess I'm saying I don't care if you plaster my name all over Usenet. | It gets me business. | Of course, it doesn't hurt that I have a long list of satisfied customers he | was able to check, too. :-) -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: ~BD~ on 26 Apr 2010 17:36
David Kaye wrote: > I guess I do have the expertise. A guy with a networking problem was doing > some research on Google and came across the various posts labeled "David Kaye" > and decided to write me back. We spoke on the phone. He operates a real > estate office in the SF area and needs some tech help. We came to some fair > terms and I'll be working on his project Wednesday. > > They say that all publicity is good publicity. I'm not sure if that's true, > but I'm happy that he took a chance on me. > > So, I guess I'm saying I don't care if you plaster my name all over Usenet. > It gets me business. > > Of course, it doesn't hurt that I have a long list of satisfied customers he > was able to check, too. > David Kaye - it was a serious question! ;-) Have you *ever* looked closely at an operating system - after it has been declared *clean* by MBAM - to determine if there might still be some malware resident on the machine? My suspicion is that most folk would *never* delve further. Always wonderin'! -- Dave |