Has Trojan Remover Ever Found Anything?
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: gufus on 5 Apr 2010 18:03 Hello, Leythos! You wrote on Sat, 3 Apr 2010 19:49:13 -0400: L> I've trj 6.8.1 many times on compromised machines when none of the L> leading apps would even start and it's removed many malware from those L> machines, enough that the others would run properly. So in your opinion, what's a /GOOD/ Trojan/Malware remover? I've been stuck on MD Defender for XP, It's has some features I like, liked warning ya to system changes, and the software explores is kinna neat. -- With best regards, gufus. E-mail: stop.nospam.gbbsg(a)shaw.ca
From: FromTheRafters on 5 Apr 2010 20:49 "gufus" <stop.nospam.gbbsg(a)shaw.ca> wrote in message news:S6tun.93808$gF5.85406(a)newsfe13.iad... > Hello, Leythos! > > You wrote on Sat, 3 Apr 2010 19:49:13 -0400: > > L> I've trj 6.8.1 many times on compromised machines when none of the > L> leading apps would even start and it's removed many malware from > those > L> machines, enough that the others would run properly. > > > So in your opinion, what's a /GOOD/ Trojan/Malware remover? > > I've been stuck on MD Defender for XP, It's has some features I like, > liked warning ya to system changes, and the software explores is kinna > neat. In the stated case, it was worthwhile to have a lesser known antimalware because the better known ones are specifically attacked by the modern malware. The better a program gets at removing malware, the more the malware writers will specifically attack it. {{ we need to rootkit our own machines }}
From: gufus on 6 Apr 2010 15:59 Hello, FromTheRafters! You wrote on Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:49:36 -0400: F> In the stated case, it was worthwhile to have a lesser known antimalware F> because the better known ones are specifically attacked by the modern F> malware. The better a program gets at removing malware, the more the F> malware writers will specifically attack it. Don't you know it, just like the saying goes, "it;'s lonely at the top" I should know, I run my own payroll, and my staff always take pot shots at me. Do get me wrong, I've had some staff for 7+ years but still, it's their job to get in my face. Arg..... F> {{ we need to rootkit our own machines }} What do you think of MS Defender? -- With best regards, gufus. E-mail: stop.nospam.gbbsg(a)shaw.ca
From: FromTheRafters on 8 Apr 2010 07:33 "gufus" <stop.nospam.gbbsg(a)shaw.ca> wrote in message news:FoMun.175602$wr5.10618(a)newsfe22.iad... > Hello, FromTheRafters! > > You wrote on Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:49:36 -0400: > > F> In the stated case, it was worthwhile to have a lesser known > antimalware > F> because the better known ones are specifically attacked by the > modern > F> malware. The better a program gets at removing malware, the more > the > F> malware writers will specifically attack it. > > Don't you know it, just like the saying goes, "it;'s lonely at the > top" I should know, I run my own payroll, and my staff always take pot > shots at me. Do get me wrong, I've had some staff for 7+ years but > still, it's their job to get in my face. Arg..... > > F> {{ we need to rootkit our own machines }} > > What do you think of MS Defender? I think that it is a good idea. It hasn't caused me any trouble at all.
From: gufus on 8 Apr 2010 13:12 Hi FromTheRafters, 08 Apr 10, FromTheRafters writes to gufus: >> Don't you know it, just like the saying goes, "it;'s >> lonely at the top" I should know, I run my own payroll, >> and my staff always take pot shots at me. Do get me wrong, >> I've had some staff for 7+ years but still, it's their job >> to get in my face. Arg..... {{ we need to rootkit our own >> machines }} What do you think of MS Defender? > I think that it is a good idea. It hasn't caused me any > trouble at all. Thanks -- K Klement Enhance your marketing at http://www.gypsy-designs.com mailto:info(a)gypsy-designs.com Gypsy Designs Fax: (403) 242-3221 .... Good news. Ten weeks from Friday will be a good day.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Malware:TR/Crypt.XPACK.Gen [trojan] Next: Malware:TR/Crypt.XPACK.Gen [trojan] |