Prev: does magnetic field have a honeycomb geometry? Chapt 11, Space is EM; magnet & iron filings Experiment #110; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Nano catalysts, and the death of Coal ;)
From: Iarnrod on 26 May 2010 08:14 On May 25, 7:49 pm, * Hates US * flailed in impotent kooker rage: > The bushkkkultie can't dispute this, either: You are the "booshkultie," Hates US, FACT. You are a counter-disinfo shill paid by AWOL to post your patently insane ridiculous physically inmpossible claims so as to discredit the true reality-based opposition to the criminal Boosh regime. This is not even remotely in dispute. Your persistence in posting your debunked claims is all the proof we need. * Hates US, * explain how you "think" you can get around the FACT that your claims have been proven to be physically impossible. I predict that as usual, you will FAIL to deal with it.
From: Iarnrod on 26 May 2010 23:38 On May 26, 6:20 am, * Hates US * flailed in impotent kooker rage: > The bushkkkultie can't dispute this, either: You are the "booshkultie," Hates US, FACT. You are a counter-disinfo shill paid by AWOL to post your patently insane ridiculous physically inmpossible claims so as to discredit the true reality-based opposition to the criminal Boosh regime. This is not even remotely in dispute. Your persistence in posting your debunked claims is all the proof we need. * Hates US, * explain how you "think" you can get around the FACT that your claims have been proven to be physically impossible. I predicted that as usual, you would FAIL to deal with it. AND AS USUAL, I WAS CORRECT! Thanks!!
From: Iarnrod on 26 May 2010 23:39 On May 26, 6:21 am, * US * wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:15:32 -0400, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >Bob Myers wrote: > >> On 5/25/2010 7:29 AM, * US * wrote: > >>> Education helps. > >>> These are architects and engineers. > > >> So are a lot of us here, Skippy. > > > Curious that none of you seem to be able to comprehend > >a concept as simple as free fall acceleration. <chuckle> > > Indeed. > > An aircraft hitting a building that was designed > to withstand such an impact doesn't magically > reduce the lower parts of the building to dust. Good, because that's not what happened. "DUST!" BWAHAAAHAHHAHAAAA!!! Multi-ton steel specks of "DUST!" BWAHAHAHHAAA!!! Your insanity is nothing if not entertaining to your oh so many betters, kook.
From: Iarnrod on 27 May 2010 08:12 On May 27, 4:36 am, * Hates US * lied: > "Scientists Discover Both Residues > And Unignited Fragments > Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics > In Debris From the Twin Towers" > > http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html > > On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:15:32 -0400, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >Bob Myers wrote: > >> On 5/25/2010 7:29 AM, * US * wrote: > >>> Education helps. > >>> These are architects and engineers. > > >> So are a lot of us here, Skippy. > > > Curious that none of you seem to be able to comprehend > >a concept as simple as free fall acceleration. <chuckle> > > Indeed. > > An aircraft hitting a building that was designed > to withstand such an impact doesn't magically > reduce the lower parts of the building to dust. Well, since that isn't what happened on 9/11, it's irrelevant.
From: Iarnrod on 27 May 2010 23:14
On May 27, 7:39 pm, * Hates US * flailed in impotent kooker rage: > The bushkkkultie can't dispute this, either: You are the "booshkultie," Hates US, FACT. You are a counter-disinfo shill paid by AWOL to post your patently insane ridiculous physically inmpossible claims so as to discredit the true reality-based opposition to the criminal Boosh regime. This is not even remotely in dispute. Your persistence in posting your debunked claims is all the proof we need. * Hates US, * explain how you "think" you can get around the FACT that your claims have been proven to be physically impossible. I predicted that as usual, you would FAIL to deal with it. AND AS USUAL, I WAS CORRECT! Thanks!! |