From: Nobody on 26 Mar 2010 13:38 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:23:25 +0000, Harishankar wrote: > Have you people embraced Python 3.x or still with 2.5 or 2.6? Still with 2.6, and probably will be indefinitely. I use Python mostly for Unix scripting: the kind of task which would traditionally have used Bourne shell. For that purpose, life is much simpler when everything is byte strings rather than character strings. If I was doing the same thing on Windows, Python 3.x would probably make more sense, as all of the OS APIs use Unicode (although there's still a hell of a lot of software written using the "ANSI" interfaces; my AppLocale folder has over a hundred entries).
From: Mensanator on 26 Mar 2010 16:07 On Mar 26, 8:23 am, Harishankar <v.harishan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Have you people embraced Python 3.x or still with 2.5 or 2.6? 3.1. The only module I use regularly is gmpy and that's one that has been updated.
From: Terry Reedy on 26 Mar 2010 19:43 On 3/26/2010 9:23 AM, Harishankar wrote: > Have you people embraced Python 3.x? Yes. My current work only needs the stdlib and I much prefer the streamlined language.
From: geremy condra on 26 Mar 2010 20:33 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Harishankar <v.harishankar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Have you people embraced Python 3.x or still with 2.5 or 2.6? > > I personally want to switch over but not too sure how many people are > using 3.x as opposed to 2 so I want to keep my programs compatible for > the majority. > > -- Hari > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > Yes- I write new code in 3.x and backport it PRN. Geremy Condra
From: David Cournapeau on 29 Mar 2010 06:06 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I won't switch until NumPy and SciPy make the jump. We're almost there, though (mostly thanks to other people's work on Numpy): http://github.com/cournape/scipy3/branches/py3k David
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Improved timedelta attributes/methods Next: Classes as namespaces? |