From: BURT on
The two times concept is the smartest.

Mitch Raemsch
From: JT on
On 7 Feb, 19:47, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> The two times concept is the smartest.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

No the infinitely many times concept is the smartest.

JT
From: BURT on
On Feb 7, 10:49 am, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 Feb, 19:47, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > The two times concept is the smartest.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> No the infinitely many times concept is the smartest.
>
> JT

You're dumb.
From: Argir Pando Vasil Dobri Matea Karagorgovi on
On Feb 7, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 10:49 am, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Feb, 19:47, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > The two times concept is the smartest.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > No the infinitely many times concept is the smartest.
>
> > JT
>
> You're dumb.

you are an irritating provocator
From: BURT on
On Feb 7, 10:52 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 10:49 am, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Feb, 19:47, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > The two times concept is the smartest.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > No the infinitely many times concept is the smartest.
>
> > JT
>



The two time-aether concept is for matter while the one time concept
is for light. But lights slow C aether rate is part of matter's
aether's time flow.

Mitch Raemsch