From: glird on 3 Apr 2010 15:05 On Apr 1, 8:00 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_x> wrote: > > Einstein decided a = 1. > Now > @tau/@t = delta tau /delta t = > @t/@tau = > delta t /delta tau = > dt/dtau = > dtau/dt = 1 > Goodbye gamma. > Goodbye babbling cretin. Dear John Babble Walker, The REASON "Einstein decided a = 1" is that in Lorentz's 1904 paper, he (Lorentz!) said that the ONLY effect of a system's motion would be a deformation of its lengths, Given that, then there would be no change in rates of anything; including the rate at which clocks beat. Therefore, dt'/dt = 1 WOULD be the ratio of rates, dt' : dt, of clocks of two differently moving systems. Given that his equations would "be linear on account of the properties of homogeneity" E attributed "to space and time", you are right insofar as "@tau/@t = delta tau /delta ... = 1" is concerned. In P1! @t/@tau = delta t /delta tau = dt/dtau = a = 1. However, the little detail you slipped in and on is that rather than dt/dtau = dtau/dt - 1, as in your greasy equation (which is precisely what tripped up Einstein), if a = dt/dtau = 1 as measured by system k', then dtau/dt IS NOT equal to a = 1 as measured by system K!! You, John W, are the only one on these newsgroups who pinpointed the small bimp in Einstein's paper, "Hence, if x' be chosen infinitesimally small," Although you still don't know it, eqs 4 and 5 were not derived from eq 3; nor was eq 7 derived from anything in P2. It was put there to bridge the unbridgeable gap (*) in his treatment. Although it is the most brilliant equation in his entire paper, it was and is a HUGE {though heretofore invisible} bimp -- an invention to join what came before and what came after it. * Even though a = dt/dt' DID equal 1 in P1, and a = dtau/dt DOES equal sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in P2, (both of which satisfy eq 7!); there is no logical or mathematical way to let it be both. Regards, glird
|
Pages: 1 Prev: the Death of Ath*ism - Scientific *Proof* of God... Next: Mass-Energy Equivalence |