Hello, guys! I just confirmed the complete and utter detestation of an entire arm of cryptography!? Little applause, come on.... I work hard.. :)
in [Cryptography]
|
Prev: I chose the term "Effective" as nearing the antonym of "Antonym" to fit the string in NP-Crypt
Next: Number of Bits in SSH2 Digital Signature Used for Public Key Authentication?
From: Turing's Worst Nightmare on 19 May 2010 10:13 On May 19, 7:12 am, "Turing's Worst Nightmare" <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that > guesses of the secret key to decrypt and verify the process, the > actual recipient would use the message or efficient. A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that guesses of the secret key to decrypt and verify the process, the actual recipient would use the message or efficient.
From: MrD on 19 May 2010 12:26 Turing's Worst Nightmare wrote: > On May 19, 7:12 am, "Turing's Worst Nightmare" > <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that >> guesses of the secret key �to decrypt and verify the process, the >> actual recipient would use the message or efficient. > > A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that > guesses of the secret key �to decrypt and verify the process, the > actual recipient would use the message or efficient. This looks like hipcrime or something. Can you work on your grammar please? That message simply cannot be parsed, even if strict grammar rules are ignored. -- MrD.
From: jbriggs444 on 19 May 2010 13:51
On May 19, 12:26 pm, MrD <mrdemean...(a)jackpot.invalid> wrote: > Turing's Worst Nightmare wrote: > > On May 19, 7:12 am, "Turing's Worst Nightmare" > > <marty.musa...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that > >> guesses of the secret key to decrypt and verify the process, the > >> actual recipient would use the message or efficient. > > > A NP algorithm can break any asymmetric cryptographic system that > > guesses of the secret key to decrypt and verify the process, the > > actual recipient would use the message or efficient. > > This looks like hipcrime or something. Can you work on your grammar > please? That message simply cannot be parsed, even if strict grammar > rules are ignored. > > -- > MrD. Best practice is to ignore Musatov. He doesn't even pretend to be rational. Apparently he's in it for the disruption. |