Help with cclient
in [FreeBSD]
|
Prev: SMCWPCI-G and FreeBSD 6?
Next: qwmu help
From: Brent Bolin on 1 Feb 2007 16:36 On Feb 1, 10:01 am, Warren Block <wbl...(a)wonkity.com> wrote: > Brent Bolin <brent.bo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 31, 8:28 pm, Warren Block <wbl...(a)wonkity.com> wrote: > > >> inetd is disabled by default. Do you have inetd_enable="YES" in > >> /etc/rc.conf? > > > You are correct...I'm a dummy. > > No, it's easy to miss. Most things now don't use inetd because of the > security implications. That can probably be done with cclient. > > -- > Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA There a number of things that have changed since my last load (5.4) Entire /usr/local/etc/rd.d is different... no more package.sh Anyway thanks for your reply. Good to know FBSD is on the move. It's my favorite O/S. btb
From: Brent Bolin on 2 Feb 2007 09:36 On Feb 1, 3:36 pm, "Brent Bolin" <brent.bo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 1, 10:01 am, Warren Block <wbl...(a)wonkity.com> wrote: > > > Brent Bolin <brent.bo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 8:28 pm, Warren Block <wbl...(a)wonkity.com> wrote: > > > >> inetd is disabled by default. Do you have inetd_enable="YES" in > > >> /etc/rc.conf? > > > > You are correct...I'm a dummy. > > > No, it's easy to miss. Most things now don't use inetd because of the > > security implications. That can probably be done with cclient. > > > -- > > Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA > > There a number of things that have changed since my last load (5.4) > > Entire /usr/local/etc/rd.d is different... no more package.sh > > Anyway thanks for your reply. Good to know FBSD is on the move. It's > my favorite O/S. > > btb I'm still confused about current FBSD startup after reading the handbook. As noted above packages that were installed in previous releases were installed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d with package.sh.sample The file had to be renamed to package.sh and /etc/rc.conf edited to start it. I installed the mailscanner package. But I didn't let the system start it on a normal boot. I started it manually. I'm not in front of the system right now, but I don't think it was installed as package.sh Is this still the procedure with FBSD 6.2 ?
From: Warren Block on 2 Feb 2007 09:50
Brent Bolin <brent.bolin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm still confused about current FBSD startup after reading the > handbook. As noted above packages that were installed in previous > releases were installed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d with package.sh.sample > > The file had to be renamed to package.sh and /etc/rc.conf edited to > start it. > > I installed the mailscanner package. But I didn't let the system > start it on a normal boot. I started it manually. > > I'm not in front of the system right now, but I don't think it was > installed as package.sh > > Is this still the procedure with FBSD 6.2 ? Application startup scripts still go in /usr/local/etc/rc.d, but they don't have to end in .sh any more. -- Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA |