Prev: The metric system sucks
Next: Interactive solution of the time dependent Schroedinger equation
From: harry on 2 Feb 2010 21:48

"JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2e989cb9-7346-4388-8d91-86752fd14edf(a)l24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>It has long been a matter of debate how random is associated with
>primes with it well established that the prime distribution itself--
>is NOT random.

<snip monkey math>


>Regardless, now is available a perfectly random distribution.
>Mathematically perfectly random, using prime numbers.

your sentance structure is wrong.
Also you are self-conflicted as you say primes are not random and then that
they are random.

>The main thing was just to isolate the prime distribution away, and
>focus on residues of primes relative to each other, and random just
>jumps out at you.

you do not understand "random" or use the word correctly.
please post in;

alt.girly.librarians.age24.frustrated


>James Harris


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: The metric system sucks
Next: Interactive solution of the time dependent Schroedinger equation