From: John Larkin on
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT), Fred <byrdlegges(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Jun 12, 1:14�pm, �Leo� <leo2...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 12 jun, 14:27, John Larkin
>>
>>
>>
>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:09:33 -0700 (PDT), �Leo� <leo2...(a)gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > >I need to make a high input impedance amplifier for a mic preamp with
>> > >a single supply. I was thinking of using a TL071 (non-inverting) opamp
>> > >with high resistance bias resistors (to bias the opamp to half the
>> > >supply voltage) so the input impedance results is �aprox. 1MegOhm. But
>> > >I don't know if such a scheme would work. I figured since the input
>> > >bias currents in the JFET input opamps are very low (max 200pA @ 25�C,
>> > >7nA full range) I could bias it with two 2.2MegOhm resistors. Also I
>> > >think adding high value resistors increases noise at the input...and
>> > >the overall gain of the circuit would be kind of large (~1000, or
>> > >perhaps larger), so it would give me a large noise at the output. The
>> > >input from the mic is in the micro-volt range.
>>
>> > >I don`t know if a discrete bipolar solution would be better...or any
>> > >other clever circuit configuratios for that matter...
>>
>> > What sort of microphone is it? What's its impedance? Is it DC
>> > continuous? Do you have access to both ends?
>>
>> > John
>>
>> I don't have the specs, but it is a SM58 kind of mic. Cheaper, with
>> worse specs I imagine. Here's the SM58http://www.shure.com/americas/products/microphones/sm/sm58-vocal-micr...
>
>http://sound.westhost.com/project66.htm
>http://www.jensen-transformers.com/apps_sc.html
>http://orca.st.usm.edu/~jmneal/preamp1.htm
>http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Circuits/Audio/dyn_mic/dyn_mic.htm


4 out of 4 horrible circuits. That's about average in the audio world.

John

From: Jan Panteltje on
On a sunny day (Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:14:59 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
<leo2100(a)gmail.com> wrote in
<97bdfe1c-2545-4d6d-a157-1e8abb0ebdc0(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>:

>On 12 jun, 14:27, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:09:33 -0700 (PDT), �Leo� <leo2...(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I need to make a high input impedance amplifier for a mic preamp with
>> >a single supply. I was thinking of using a TL071 (non-inverting) opamp
>> >with high resistance bias resistors (to bias the opamp to half the
>> >supply voltage) so the input impedance results is �aprox. 1MegOhm. But
>> >I don't know if such a scheme would work. I figured since the input
>> >bias currents in the JFET input opamps are very low (max 200pA @ 25�C,
>> >7nA full range) I could bias it with two 2.2MegOhm resistors. Also I
>> >think adding high value resistors increases noise at the input...and
>> >the overall gain of the circuit would be kind of large (~1000, or
>> >perhaps larger), so it would give me a large noise at the output. The
>> >input from the mic is in the micro-volt range.
>>
>> >I don`t know if a discrete bipolar solution would be better...or any
>> >other clever circuit configuratios for that matter...
>>
>> What sort of microphone is it? What's its impedance? Is it DC
>> continuous? Do you have access to both ends?
>>
>> John
>
>I don't have the specs, but it is a SM58 kind of mic. Cheaper, with
>worse specs I imagine. Here's the SM58
>http://www.shure.com/americas/products/microphones/sm/sm58-vocal-microphone

That is a dynamic mike, with 300 Ohm impedance,
datasheet page 2, read it.
No high impedances involved anywhere,
(I hope Phil agrees else I am ....)
From: Phil Allison on

"�Leo�"

I don't have the specs, but it is a SM58 kind of mic. Cheaper, with
worse specs I imagine.


** The SM58 is a LOW impedance mic !!

The input referenced self noise of a TL071 is more than a few micro-volts.

The output signal from an SM58 is normally in the range of tens to hundreds
of millivolts.

What planet are you living on ???


.... Phil



From: Phil Allison on

"Jan Panteltje"
>
>>I don't have the specs, but it is a SM58 kind of mic. Cheaper, with
>>worse specs I imagine. Here's the SM58
>>http://www.shure.com/americas/products/microphones/sm/sm58-vocal-microphone
>
> That is a dynamic mike, with 300 Ohm impedance,
> datasheet page 2, read it.
> No high impedances involved anywhere,
> (I hope Phil agrees else I am ....)


** The SM58 mic and its many clones have a source impedance of 200 to 300
ohms and a self noise of about 0.25uV in the audio band - which in practice
equates to an SPL of about 15 dB.

A speaking voice at a range of say 1 foot will cause the mic to generate
about 10mV of signal.

Yelling into the mic with it close held as possible to the lips will
generate upwards of 1 volt rms.

The mic can tolerate SPLs of up to 150dB even at low audio frequencies.

A genuine Shure SM58 has a very low impedance diaphragm of about 14 ohms
followed by an internal 4:1 auto-transformer (magnetically unshielded )
wired to step up the impedance to 270 ohms, once winding resistances are
taken into account. The output signal floats and is connected across pins 2
and 3 of a male XLR socket at the end of the handle.

However, I have seen a Chinese made clone of the SM58 where there was no
transformer, the impedance was 600 ohms and the output signal was not
floating.



..... Phil


From: John Larkin on
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:01:47 +1000, "Phil Allison" <phil_a(a)tpg.com.au>
wrote:

>
>"�Leo�"
>
>I don't have the specs, but it is a SM58 kind of mic. Cheaper, with
>worse specs I imagine.
>
>
>** The SM58 is a LOW impedance mic !!
>
>The input referenced self noise of a TL071 is more than a few micro-volts.
>
>The output signal from an SM58 is normally in the range of tens to hundreds
>of millivolts.
>
>What planet are you living on ???
>
>
>... Phil
>
>

The SM58 datasheet says 1.85 mV output at 94 dB spl. And 300 ohms
impedance.

What's a reasonable equivalent SPL noise level for a mic amp? At some
point, even in a good studio, there must be some background noise. How
does that compare to typical electrical noise?

And what do you think is the equivalent noise temperature of a dynamic
mic? Does brownian motion matter?

John