From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:44:06 -0700, Robert Baer
<robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:

>Jim Slone wrote:
>> What are the best options for high quality audio white noise
>> generation?
>>
>> I have been using generic diodes and reversed biased transistors. Then
>> someone mentioned there are special parts available with better
>> characteristics.
>>
>> Can anyone please give me a pointer?
>>
>> Jim Slone
> Racist!
> We want Black noise.


Homophobe! We want Pink noise!

John

From: Glenn Gundlach on
On May 31, 7:21 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:44:06 -0700, Robert Baer
>
> <robertb...(a)localnet.com> wrote:
> >Jim Slone wrote:
> >> What are the best options for high quality audio white noise
> >> generation?
>
> >> I have been using generic diodes and reversed biased transistors. Then
> >> someone mentioned there are special parts available with better
> >> characteristics.
>
> >> Can anyone please give me a pointer?
>
> >> Jim Slone
> >   Racist!
> >   We want Black noise.
>
> Homophobe! We want Pink noise!
>
> John

Adobe Audition generates brown noise in addition to white and pink...


From: John Larkin on
On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:48:40 -0700 (PDT), Glenn Gundlach
<stratus46(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On May 31, 7:21�pm, John Larkin
><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:44:06 -0700, Robert Baer
>>
>> <robertb...(a)localnet.com> wrote:
>> >Jim Slone wrote:
>> >> What are the best options for high quality audio white noise
>> >> generation?
>>
>> >> I have been using generic diodes and reversed biased transistors. Then
>> >> someone mentioned there are special parts available with better
>> >> characteristics.
>>
>> >> Can anyone please give me a pointer?
>>
>> >> Jim Slone
>> > � Racist!
>> > � We want Black noise.
>>
>> Homophobe! We want Pink noise!
>>
>> John
>
>Adobe Audition generates brown noise in addition to white and pink...
>
>G�

Save the Earth. Make Green Noise.

John

From: Don Klipstein on
In article <3jr806h54gl64tdjhq30db2ns68slnpkdc(a)4ax.com>, John Larkin wrote:
>On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:44:06 -0700, Robert Baer
><robertbaer(a)localnet.com> wrote:
>
>>Jim Slone wrote:
>>> What are the best options for high quality audio white noise
>>> generation?
>>>
>>> I have been using generic diodes and reversed biased transistors. Then
>>> someone mentioned there are special parts available with better
>>> characteristics.
>>>
>>> Can anyone please give me a pointer?
>>>
>>> Jim Slone
>> Racist!
>> We want Black noise.
>
>Homophobe! We want Pink noise!

A link previously mentioned in this thread offered what they said
was "pink noise", along with "white noise" and "brown/red noise" IIRC.

I do get a little into a mood to test the "pink noise" to see if it is
"truly pink" as opposed to something towards "purple noise"... I hope
only as a result of some midrange frequency response dip in my computer
loudspeakers ("they are fairly-el-cheapo" that *may* accentuate "lower
treble" and "bass end of midrange").

--
- Don Klipstein (don(a)misty.com)
From: lektric.dan on
On May 31, 7:23 am, jimsl...(a)esterlux.com (Jim Slone) wrote:
> What are the best options for high quality audio white noise
> generation?
>
I'm not sure what metrics you use for "best". I needed to generate
some white, pink, and other cokored/filtered noises for audio
testing. I used the Audacity free software program. You can generate
colored noise and filter it, then save either the project or the
waveform (various formats) for replay.