Holy S---!! Pentax's medium format is only $9400!!!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Cylinder liner....
Next: Electric locomotive...
From: Alfred Molon on 13 Mar 2010 04:04 In article <4b9aaccd$0$1783$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au>, dj_nme(a)optusnet.com.au says... > Why do you really believe that this sort of consumer-level EVF would > pass muster on a pro-level MF digital camera? Why not? It's 800x600x3 and zoomable. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Alfred Molon on 13 Mar 2010 04:06 In article <4f97e$4b9b148d$546accd9$31063(a)cache90.multikabel.net>, spamtrap(a)arumes.com says... > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:47:17 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote: > > > In article <e560e$4b9ab539$546accd9$13071(a)cache90.multikabel.net>, > > spamtrap(a)arumes.com says... > >> You don't even > >> understand what the term "full frame CCD" refers to. > > > > Nope, you are not expressing yourself clearly. > > > > There are full frame transfer and interline transfer CCDs, but you are > > talking about "full frame CCD", which is imprecise. > > > > With "full frame" cameras people usually refer to cameras with 24x36mm > > sensors. See here > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device#Architecture Also on that page they use the term "frame transfer" - you wrote "full frame CCD". Lern to express yourself precisely. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
From: Robert Spanjaard on 13 Mar 2010 06:18 On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:06:30 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote: > In article <4f97e$4b9b148d$546accd9$31063(a)cache90.multikabel.net>, > spamtrap(a)arumes.com says... >> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:47:17 +0100, Alfred Molon wrote: >> >> > In article <e560e$4b9ab539$546accd9$13071(a)cache90.multikabel.net>, >> > spamtrap(a)arumes.com says... >> >> You don't even >> >> understand what the term "full frame CCD" refers to. >> > >> > Nope, you are not expressing yourself clearly. >> > >> > There are full frame transfer and interline transfer CCDs, but you >> > are talking about "full frame CCD", which is imprecise. >> > >> > With "full frame" cameras people usually refer to cameras with >> > 24x36mm sensors. See here >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full-frame_digital_SLR >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device#Architecture > > Also on that page they use the term "frame transfer" - Which is not the same type of CCD as "full frame". > you wrote "full frame CCD". Because that's exactly what I was writing about. > Lern to express yourself precisely. I did. -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Paul Furman on 13 Mar 2010 11:15 Alfred Molon wrote: > In article<4b9aaccd$0$1783$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au>, > dj_nme(a)optusnet.com.au says... > >> Why do you really believe that this sort of consumer-level EVF would >> pass muster on a pro-level MF digital camera? > > Why not? It's 800x600x3 and zoomable. Here's something more suitable: http://www.red.com/store/100-0003
From: Paul Furman on 13 Mar 2010 11:33
Neil Ellwood wrote: > RichA wrote: > >> Talk about crushing the price barrier in the medium format!! >> http://www.dpreview.com/news/1003/10031002pentax645d.asp > > So it isn't really a 645 but just a cropped sensor. It's a 433, not 645 (44x33mm vs 60x45mm). Still I wouldn't complain if someone wants to buy me one :-) |