Hot Standby 0.2.1
in [PgSql]
|
From: David Fetter on 15 Sep 2009 18:05 On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:41:59PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > OK, here is the latest version of the Hot Standby patchset. This is > about version 30+ by now, but we should regard this as 0.2.1 Patch > against CVS HEAD (now): clean apply, compile, no known bugs. Kudos!!!! Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david(a)fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter(a)gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Bernd Helmle on 16 Sep 2009 04:38 --On 15. September 2009 22:41:59 +0100 Simon Riggs <simon(a)2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/0/01/Hot_Standby_Recovery_Functions.pdf This doesn't work for me, it seems the correct link is <http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/1/10/Hot_Standby_Recovery_Functions.pdf> ? -- Thanks Bernd -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Josh Berkus on 16 Sep 2009 18:05 All, Now that Simon has submitted this, can some of the heavy-hitters here review it? Heikki? Nobody's name is next to it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Robert Haas on 16 Sep 2009 19:32 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote: > Now that Simon has submitted this, can some of the heavy-hitters here > review it? Heikki? > > Nobody's name is next to it. I don't think anyone is planning to ignore this patch, but it wasn't included in the first round of round-robin reviewing assignments because it wasn't submitted until the following day, after the announced deadline for submissions had already passed. So most people are probably busy with with some other patch at the moment, but that's a temporary phenomenon. This is a pretty small CommitFest, so there shouldn't be any shortage of reviewers, though Heikki's time may be stretched a little thin, since Streaming Replication is also in the queue, and he is working on index-only scans. That's really for him to comment on, though. ....Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Heikki Linnakangas on 17 Sep 2009 02:54
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(a)agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Now that Simon has submitted this, can some of the heavy-hitters here >> review it? Heikki? >> >> Nobody's name is next to it. > > I don't think anyone is planning to ignore this patch, but it wasn't > included in the first round of round-robin reviewing assignments > because it wasn't submitted until the following day, after the > announced deadline for submissions had already passed. So most people > are probably busy with with some other patch at the moment, but that's > a temporary phenomenon. Right, I've added myself as reviewer now. > This is a pretty small CommitFest, so there > shouldn't be any shortage of reviewers, though Heikki's time may be > stretched a little thin, since Streaming Replication is also in the > queue, and he is working on index-only scans. That's really for him > to comment on, though. I'm going to put the index-only scans aside for now to focus on hot standby and streaming replication. Both are big patches, so there's plenty of work in those two alone, and not only for me. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |