Prev: How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA is Consistent (EASY PROOF)
Next: Finite Sum Problem
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 14 Jun 2010 11:45 Charlie-Boo <shymathguy(a)gmail.com> writes: > Since PA can't prove something as simple as that, how could anyone be > so stupid as to claim ZFC/PA is a good basis for all of our ordinary > math? Who makes this claim? You're hallucinating. -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: jobbin on 7 Jul 2010 22:34 Today, I'll be showing you the new [url=http://www.b2bsharing.com/footwear-nike-basketball-shoes-c-3502_3847.html][b]basketball shoes[/b][/url]. The Nike Zoom Hyperfuse will be out very soon and the [url=http://www.b2bsharing.com/footwear-nike-air-jordan-shoes-c-3502_3571.html][b]jordans basketball shoes[/b][/url] is unlike anything Nike basketball has ever done.
From: jobbin on 7 Jul 2010 22:34
Today, I'll be showing you the new [url=http://www.b2bsharing.com/footwear-nike-basketball-shoes-c-3502_3847.html][b]basketball shoes[/b][/url]. The Nike Zoom Hyperfuse will be out very soon and the [url=http://www.b2bsharing.com/footwear-nike-air-jordan-shoes-c-3502_3571.html][b]jordans basketball shoes[/b][/url] is unlike anything Nike basketball has ever done. |