How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA isConsistent(EASYPROOF)
in [Logic]
|
Prev: Quine, and Truth is anything we want it to be.
Next: How Can ZFC/PA do much of Math - it Can't Even Prove PA isConsistent(EASYPROOF)
From: Marshall on 3 Jul 2010 18:21 On Jul 3, 1:48 pm, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...(a)shaw.ca> wrote: > herbzet wrote: > > > You seemed to have blasted cranks and trolls, but why your countering > arguments have a trade-mark of theirs: short and no technical substance? Anyone can say that, including one who has been presented lots of lengthy and technically substantial arguments, such as you. > >> The naturals must > >> be more than just a set of elements, surely you must know that. > > > Must they? > > Of course they must according to _you_ below ... Above, one of Nam's many beloved tricks: say something stupid, then when called on it, say "but that's what *you* said!" Marshall
From: Marshall on 3 Jul 2010 19:31
On Jul 3, 3:34 pm, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...(a)shaw.ca> wrote: > Marshall wrote: > > On Jul 3, 1:48 pm, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...(a)shaw.ca> wrote: > >> herbzet wrote: > > >> You seemed to have blasted cranks and trolls, but why your countering > >> arguments have a trade-mark of theirs: short and no technical substance? > > > Anyone can say that, including one who has been presented lots > > of lengthy and technically substantial arguments, such as you. > > >>>> The naturals must > >>>> be more than just a set of elements, surely you must know that. > >>> Must they? > >> Of course they must according to _you_ below ... > > > Above, one of Nam's many beloved tricks: say something > > stupid, then when called on it, say "but that's what *you* said!" > > Are you jumping in to answer the technical question if one would > be able to know exactly what the natural numbers be, in herbzet's > absence? Or are you just wanting to start an idiotic flame war just > to have your own fun? The latter. I've tried the former, and established beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no point in discussing technical matters with you. You are a talentless buffoon, a potato chip, an annoying and overarchingly arrogant twit. Marshall |