Prev: Question about the complexity of a sentence
Next: Is Borel determinacy true in the recursive reals?
From: |-|ercules on 21 Jun 2010 02:28
Every possible combination X wide...

What is X?

Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question.

Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at!

This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide!

0.00
0.01
0.02
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.20
0.21
0.22

HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS?

Herc
--
If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase
"Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson
From: Rupert on 21 Jun 2010 03:03
On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Every possible combination X wide...
>
> What is X?
>
> Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question.
>
> Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at!
>
> This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide!
>
> 0.00
> 0.01
> 0.02
> 0.10
> 0.11
> 0.12
> 0.20
> 0.21
> 0.22
>
> HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS?
>
> Herc
> --
> If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase
> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson

It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set
of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer
greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph-
null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included.
From: Sylvia Else on 21 Jun 2010 08:40
On 21/06/2010 5:03 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules"<radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Every possible combination X wide...
>>
>> What is X?
>>
>> Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question.
>>
>> Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at!
>>
>> This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide!
>>
>> 0.00
>> 0.01
>> 0.02
>> 0.10
>> 0.11
>> 0.12
>> 0.20
>> 0.21
>> 0.22
>>
>> HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS?
>>
>> Herc
>> --
>> If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase
>> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson
>
> It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set
> of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer
> greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph-
> null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included.

That answer looks correct.

But I guarantee that Herc won't accept it.

Sylvia.
From: Graham Cooper on 21 Jun 2010 10:08
On Jun 21, 10:40 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...(a)not.here.invalid> wrote:
> On 21/06/2010 5:03 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules"<radgray...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> Every possible combination X wide...
>
> >> What is X?
>
> >> Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question.
>
> >> Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at!
>
> >> This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide!
>
> >> 0.00
> >> 0.01
> >> 0.02
> >> 0.10
> >> 0.11
> >> 0.12
> >> 0.20
> >> 0.21
> >> 0.22
>
> >> HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS?
>
> >> Herc
> >> --
> >> If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase
> >> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson
>
> > It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set
> > of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer
> > greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph-
> > null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included.
>
> That answer looks correct.
>
> But I guarantee that Herc won't accept it.
>
> Sylvia.

It's truly hilarious. It's like using a Santa clause metaphor
to explain why Santa clause is not real,
but it will do for now.

Herc
From: Inverse-atov JSH 19 on 21 Jun 2010 11:09
POST IT *AGAIN*!!!!

*POST IT* TO SCI.MATH!!!!

POST IT *EVERY SINGLE* DAY!!!!

POST IT *BEFORE* YOU POST IT!!!!

POST IT *AFTER* YOU POST IT!!!!

POST IT *AGAIN*!!!!

"|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:888f4bFfdiU1(a)mid.individual.net...

> Every possible fucknozzle am I, nothing to say, nothing I post,



 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: Question about the complexity of a sentence
Next: Is Borel determinacy true in the recursive reals?