How Wide Do All The Possible Computed Digit Sequences Go?
in [Math]
|
Prev: Dirac was both right and wrong about his magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #184; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: speed of light is likely to be more accurately that of 3.14159.. x 10^8 m/s; magnetic monopole Chapt 14 #185; ATOM TOTALITY
From: |-|ercules on 21 Jun 2010 02:28 Every possible combination X wide... What is X? Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question. Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at! This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide! 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.20 0.21 0.22 HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS? Herc -- If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson
From: Rupert on 21 Jun 2010 03:03 On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Every possible combination X wide... > > What is X? > > Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question. > > Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at! > > This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide! > > 0.00 > 0.01 > 0.02 > 0.10 > 0.11 > 0.12 > 0.20 > 0.21 > 0.22 > > HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS? > > Herc > -- > If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase > "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph- null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included.
From: Sylvia Else on 21 Jun 2010 08:40 On 21/06/2010 5:03 PM, Rupert wrote: > On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules"<radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Every possible combination X wide... >> >> What is X? >> >> Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question. >> >> Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at! >> >> This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide! >> >> 0.00 >> 0.01 >> 0.02 >> 0.10 >> 0.11 >> 0.12 >> 0.20 >> 0.21 >> 0.22 >> >> HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS? >> >> Herc >> -- >> If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase >> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson > > It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set > of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer > greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph- > null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included. That answer looks correct. But I guarantee that Herc won't accept it. Sylvia.
From: Graham Cooper on 21 Jun 2010 10:08 On Jun 21, 10:40 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...(a)not.here.invalid> wrote: > On 21/06/2010 5:03 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 4:28 pm, "|-|ercules"<radgray...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Every possible combination X wide... > > >> What is X? > > >> Now watch as 100 mathematicians fail to parse a trivial question. > > >> Someone MUST know what idea I'm getting at! > > >> This ternary set covers all possible digits sequences 2 digits wide! > > >> 0.00 > >> 0.01 > >> 0.02 > >> 0.10 > >> 0.11 > >> 0.12 > >> 0.20 > >> 0.21 > >> 0.22 > > >> HOW WIDE ARE ALL_POSSIBLE_SEQUENCES COVERED IN THE SET OF COMPUTABLE REALS? > > >> Herc > >> -- > >> If you ever rob someone, even to get your own stuff back, don't use the phrase > >> "Nobody leave the room!" ~ OJ Simpson > > > It would probably be a good idea for you to talk instead about the set > > of all computable sequences of digits base n, where n is some integer > > greater than one. Then the length of each sequence would be aleph- > > null. But not every sequence of length aleph-null would be included. > > That answer looks correct. > > But I guarantee that Herc won't accept it. > > Sylvia. It's truly hilarious. It's like using a Santa clause metaphor to explain why Santa clause is not real, but it will do for now. Herc
From: Inverse-atov JSH 19 on 21 Jun 2010 11:09
POST IT *AGAIN*!!!! *POST IT* TO SCI.MATH!!!! POST IT *EVERY SINGLE* DAY!!!! POST IT *BEFORE* YOU POST IT!!!! POST IT *AFTER* YOU POST IT!!!! POST IT *AGAIN*!!!! "|-|ercules" <radgray123(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:888f4bFfdiU1(a)mid.individual.net... > Every possible fucknozzle am I, nothing to say, nothing I post, |