Prev: FAQ Topic - Internationalisation and Multinationalisation in javascript. (2010-03-23)
Next: FAQ Topic - How do I format a Date object with javascript? (2010-03-28)
From: Bart Van der Donck on 5 Apr 2010 05:13 Hans-Georg Michna wrote: >> www.ajax-cross-domain.com > > Why the unnecessary complexity of a Perl server service? Why not > simply use a very light proxy server, as shown in > http://winhlp.com/node/699? In so far I see, Ajax Cross Domain would use the same mechanism as your JSP/PHP, but then done in Perl: grab URI, perform request, return response. I think this is a dead simple principle; in my opinion not complex at all; the elaboration might look complex if the environment/ technology is unknown, like e.g. I would find your solution more difficult, because I am unfamiliar with JSP and PHP. I agree that Ajax Cross Domain could be considered as a server (as any CGI/PHP/ASP/...?), but I would rather look at it as a regular script, a bit in the tradition of all those ancient content-grabbers, but then then in a modern ajaxy coat. > To provide such a service for the public is nice, but would it > stand up to worldwide use? Probably not. People would have to > set up their own services, and then I fail to see the advantage > over a simple proxy server. I'm quite positive that scripts like Ajax Cross Domain reflect a real need, but you're absolutely right that multiple good solutions available. Cheers, -- Bart |