Prev: FOR ALL YOU WHO WANT TO QUITE SMOKING : ) / CHECK THIS OUT : )
Next: How do you escape double quotes in format directives?
From: Ron Garret on 4 Feb 2010 17:47 Referring to http://cybertiggyr.com/gene/lisp-heap/ and in particular at figures 3 and 4. If it were printed on paper I could understand, but these are digital images. Anyone know what happened here? rg
From: piscesboy on 4 Feb 2010 20:24 On Feb 4, 5:47 pm, Ron Garret <rNOSPA...(a)flownet.com> wrote: > Referring to > > http://cybertiggyr.com/gene/lisp-heap/ > > and in particular at figures 3 and 4. If it were printed on paper I > could understand, but these are digital images. Anyone know what > happened here? > > rg Maybe they were scanned images? It's hard to tell without a time lapse comparison of how the quality looked in the past.
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen on 4 Feb 2010 21:59
+ piscesboy <oraclmaster(a)gmail.com>: > On Feb 4, 5:47�pm, Ron Garret <rNOSPA...(a)flownet.com> wrote: >> Referring to >> >> http://cybertiggyr.com/gene/lisp-heap/ >> >> and in particular at figures 3 and 4. �If it were printed on paper I >> could understand, but these are digital images. �Anyone know what >> happened here? >> >> rg > > Maybe they were scanned images? It's hard to tell without a time lapse > comparison of how the quality looked in the past. The web page is "Converted with LaTeX2HTML 2002-2-1 (1.71)" according to a comment in the HTML code. The image even has an alt text showing part of the LaTeX code generating it. So this is likely to be a digital effect, not the result of bad scanning. From a closer look, I would guess that it might be an anti-aliasing algorithm gone horribly wrong. But why only in a limited region? I have no idea. -- * Harald Hanche-Olsen <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/> - It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true. -- Bertrand Russell |