Prev: How can an assembly work without the SequrityPermission that give it execute permission
Next: I don't really understand how CAS permission work
From: Willem van Rumpt on 23 May 2010 02:42
On 23-5-2010 3:16, Tony Johansson wrote:
> The other has been given away so to speak because of how the
> RequestedOptional work.
> So according to me this assembly doesn't even have the SequrityPermission
> that give it permission to execute ?
> I'm I right in my conclusion ?
> The strange thing is that I can execute the assembly.
>
> If I do this

Is the application running under full trust?
AFAIK, if that's the case, caspol is completely bypassed.

--
Willem van Rumpt
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: How can an assembly work without the SequrityPermission that give it execute permission
Next: I don't really understand how CAS permission work