From: Merciadri Luca on 26 Jun 2010 13:42 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Steven Lord" <slord(a)mathworks.com> writes: > "Merciadri Luca" <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in message > news:87aaqmktj8.fsf(a)merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA... > > *snip* > >> And if we go until there, we could also say that `+' is not an >> associative operator for reals, also because of reals' machine's encoding! > > "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In > practice, there is." > > http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Fact_and_theory > > Theoretically, addition is associative. In practice, for double precision > values, it isn't. Well, I know that. I was not laughing: I just wanted to mention that if you speak about such errors for matrices, this is also valid for real numbers' addition. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- The secret of life is not to do what you like, but to like what you do. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iEYEARECAAYFAkwmO/4ACgkQM0LLzLt8MhwikQCfbPgcwSbNcj8MdPV8kbp+qpZA yjEAnj+sQ8Caf3VrSMabWE+ZtDaTpJye =IZ1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Bruno Luong on 26 Jun 2010 18:14 Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in message <87mxuhelo7.fsf(a)merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA>... > >>> > I suppose `mmtimes' is some function you defined in some homemade > m-file. Well, how did you proceed to find the best way to achieve the > product? (I do not know if there is an already-established, and > efficient algorithm for doing this; it should not be difficult to find > a good implementation of this, though.) > I'm confused about your question, the mmtimes is the function I provides in post #6, and an improved version is submitted in FEX here http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/27950-mmtimes-matrix-chain-product The timing is carried with FEX version. You have replied in post #7, so why the question that sounds like from someone who has not followed the thread at all? Bruno
From: Merciadri Luca on 28 Jun 2010 16:43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> writes: > Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in message <87mxuhelo7.fsf(a)merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA>... > >> >>> >> I suppose `mmtimes' is some function you defined in some homemade >> m-file. Well, how did you proceed to find the best way to achieve the >> product? (I do not know if there is an already-established, and >> efficient algorithm for doing this; it should not be difficult to find >> a good implementation of this, though.) >> > > I'm confused about your question, the mmtimes is the function I provides in post #6, and an improved version is submitted in FEX here > http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/27950-mmtimes-matrix-chain-product Well, sorry, I try to follow so much threads that I sometimes forget answers and ask silly questions. > The timing is carried with FEX version. Ok. > > You have replied in post #7, so why the question that sounds like > from someone who has not followed the thread at all? That's not this at all; I now remember about your function. (I re-read it, and it came back to my mind.) I'm sure you understand my absentmindedness. The fact is that I even tested it partially when receiving your answer. That makes the whole story even weirder for my memory. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- Education is the best provision for the journey to old age. (Aristotle) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iEYEARECAAYFAkwpCV0ACgkQM0LLzLt8MhxRnQCgiQfXkWkXIbvK4xHcJcu3ClFg NyYAoJK+m1lW7tl6BTptDJNCfh5433oz =kqcA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From: Bruno Luong on 28 Jun 2010 17:41 Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in message <87y6dy3n35.fsf(a)merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA>... > I'm sure you understand my > absentmindedness. Yeah no problem. That's happens sometime to me too when a topic is not particular of my interest or get lost inside a junk of junks. Bruno
From: Merciadri Luca on 29 Jun 2010 04:02 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> writes: > Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri(a)student.ulg.ac.be> wrote in message <87y6dy3n35.fsf(a)merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA>... > >> I'm sure you understand my >> absentmindedness. > > Yeah no problem. That's happens sometime to me too when a topic is not particular of my interest or get lost inside a junk of junks. Sarcastic and caustic remark. This topic is not the topic which I'm the most interested in (and same for others, I think), but that does not justify my absentmindedness. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- If it's too good to be true, then it probably is. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iEYEARECAAYFAkwpqHsACgkQM0LLzLt8MhzJEwCfd2JX4M50P3Q8mEWqdAj4mWIn UOwAoJidvYed8qClBDg7XggQkMk/I6GH =v9lZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: error when using "imshow" within a "parfor" loop Next: Simulink 3D Animation Joystick |