Prev: qooxlisp version 2.0 [was Re: qooxlisp live - 3MB bloatware]
Next: [ANN] Call for Papers for 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming
From: Kenneth Tilton on 8 Jun 2010 13:28 Anyone know? Specs: 7.5 GB memory 4 EC2 Compute Units (2 virtual cores with 2 EC2 Compute Units each) 850 GB instance storage (2�420 GB plus 10 GB root partition) 64-bit platform I/O Performance: High API name: m1.large Yes, "how heavy" suffers from a lack of precision, and ... well, the data being served is what you see: 0 to thousands of symbols and 4-5 tiny attributes for each. kt -- http://www.stuckonalgebra.com "The best Algebra tutorial program I have seen... in a class by itself." Macworld
From: Kenneth Tilton on 8 Jun 2010 13:57 Kenneth Tilton wrote: > Anyone know? > > Specs: > > 7.5 GB memory > 4 EC2 Compute Units (2 virtual cores with 2 EC2 Compute Units each) > 850 GB instance storage (2�420 GB plus 10 GB root partition) > 64-bit platform > I/O Performance: High > API name: m1.large > > Yes, "how heavy" suffers from a lack of precision, and ... well, the > data being served is what you see: 0 to thousands of symbols and 4-5 > tiny attributes for each. This page shows the options: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/ This the pricing: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/ I guess the easiest thing to do is add some metrics, start small, and see where the beast bogs down? kt -- http://www.stuckonalgebra.com "The best Algebra tutorial program I have seen... in a class by itself." Macworld
From: Captain Obvious on 8 Jun 2010 18:15 KT> I guess the easiest thing to do is add some metrics, start small, and KT> see where the beast bogs down? Probably. To start with, use some program like apache bench (ab). KT> Yes, "how heavy" suffers from a lack of precision, and ... well, the KT> data being served is what you see: 0 to thousands of symbols and 4-5 KT> tiny attributes for each. Generally from my experience with web servers 50-100 requests per second per CPU core is doable.
From: Tim Bradshaw on 9 Jun 2010 05:34 On 2010-06-08 18:28:52 +0100, Kenneth Tilton said: > es, "how heavy" suffers from a lack of precision, and ... well, the > data being served is what you see: 0 to thousands of symbols and 4-5 > tiny attributes for each. I believe the traditional approach to such questions is called "measurement"
From: Kenneth Tilton on 9 Jun 2010 08:43
Tim Bradshaw wrote: > On 2010-06-08 18:28:52 +0100, Kenneth Tilton said: > >> es, "how heavy" suffers from a lack of precision, and ... well, the >> data being served is what you see: 0 to thousands of symbols and 4-5 >> tiny attributes for each. > > I believe the traditional approach to such questions is called > "measurement" > Ah, you don't know either. Anyway, your cherished wysiwyg math editor is on the way, thx to jsMath. Thx for the reference! That library and its successor has a great author. And qooxdoo is brilliant, too. Add Lisp and Cells and I should soon rule the world. kt -- http://www.stuckonalgebra.com "The best Algebra tutorial program I have seen... in a class by itself." Macworld |