How long does it take to convert a raw camera file to "default" JPG?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Forget Dpreview's B.S., "diplomatic language" NEX 16mm lensis not good
Next: How long does it take to convert a raw camera file to "default"JPG?
From: nospam on 14 Jun 2010 04:51 In article <87ocfe6osp.fld(a)apaflo.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: > Plus Adobe used Coffin's /dcraw/ in the development of > their own converter, though because Adobe is proprietary > we don't know to what degree or exactly in what way > even. very little. the raw conversion is completely different. about all that adobe used from dcraw was some decoding of maker notes. big deal.
From: LOL! on 14 Jun 2010 09:14 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:47:19 -0400, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: >In article <87eiga94cb.fld(a)apaflo.com>, Floyd L. Davidson ><floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote: > >> And why do you supposed after all these years there is >> no alternative? Could it just happen to be that dcraw >> is such a killer implementation that nobody wants to >> waste their time writing a "replacement" that will never >> be more than an obscure "almost an alternative"? > >because anyone skilled enough to do it can get paid quite well for it, >rather than wasting their time on something that is given away. that's >why the state of the art converters are commercial products, such as >camera raw, capture one, dxo, etc. "State of the art"?!? LOL! http://www.rawtherapee.com/RAW_Compare/ All the ones you mentioned fail when compared to freeware and donation-ware software. LOL!!!!!! Keep on trolling you pretend-photographer fool! LOL!
From: nospam on 14 Jun 2010 12:27 In article <2010061407245343658-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > It is also worth noting, that Adobe has a completely new process for > ACR 6.1 delivered with CS5 and LR3. The first substantial change to > their ACR process since 2003. good point. that's a huge step forward, especially in noise reduction. you'll never see something like that in dcraw.
From: Peter on 14 Jun 2010 19:58 "Floyd L. Davidson" <floyd(a)apaflo.com> wrote in message news:87ocfe6osp.fld(a)apaflo.com... > Do you even know what /dcraw/ is? > I DO! Arguments like you and Ray are having in this thread, sticks in decraw. -- Peter
From: Peter on 14 Jun 2010 20:02
"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:140620101227313053%nospam(a)nospam.invalid... > In article <2010061407245343658-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom>, > Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote: > >> It is also worth noting, that Adobe has a completely new process for >> ACR 6.1 delivered with CS5 and LR3. The first substantial change to >> their ACR process since 2003. > > good point. that's a huge step forward, especially in noise reduction. > I haven't played with NR or sharpening in ACR 6.1. In the past I have been doing all NR and sharpening in PS. Is there a significant advantage to doing it in ACR? -- Peter |