From: Wojtek on 26 Mar 2010 16:13 Lew wrote : > Stefan Ram wrote: >> � If everything else fails, I use >> >> @java.lang.SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" ) > > Note that if one's analysis is incorrect, i.e., that the types don't > actually match, then the suppression of warnings defeats the purpose > of generics, to eliminate ClassCastException. > > Suppressing the "unchecked" warning is reserved for times when the > programmer has guaranteed that there cannot be a ClassCastException, > but cannot satisfy the compiler that this is so, e.g., when using an > expression like casting '(T)' > to a parametrized type. > > If the programmer has not made that guarantee, then there's no point > to suppressing the warning. Moreover the suppress warnings acts on the entire method, so any and all questionable casts will be ignored. The only place I use SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" ) is in a method which only does that one cast to return the object. -- Wojtek :-)
From: Lew on 26 Mar 2010 16:37 Stefan Ram wrote: >>> If everything else fails, I use > >>> @java.lang.SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" ) > Lew wrote: >> Note that if one's analysis is incorrect, i.e., that the types don't >> actually match, then the suppression of warnings defeats the purpose >> of generics, to eliminate ClassCastException. > >> Suppressing the "unchecked" warning is reserved for times when the >> programmer has guaranteed that there cannot be a ClassCastException, >> but cannot satisfy the compiler that this is so, e.g., when using an >> expression like casting '(T)' >> to a parametrized type. > >> If the programmer has not made that guarantee, then there's no point >> to suppressing the warning. > > Moreover the suppress warnings acts on the entire method, so any and > all questionable casts will be ignored. > Only if you apply it to the entire method. You should probably not do that, but apply it to a narrower scope. > The only place I use SuppressWarnings( "unchecked" ) is in a method > which only does that one cast to return the object. > Apply the annotation to the narrowest scope feasible. I assign a variable to absorb the uncheckedness. public <T> T makeT( String specifiesT ) { @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // the String arg will prevent ClassCastException final T foo = (T) Class.forName( specifiesT ); return foo; } This snippet does not properly show how the code guarantees the correct type, so actually it's wrong. If I were doing this correctly, there'd be code to ensure that the '@SuppressWarnings()' actually is safe, and the comment would explain that, consistent with the recommendations in /Effective Java/ by Joshua Bloch. <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/effective/generics.pdf> -- Lew
From: Lew on 26 Mar 2010 19:24 Steven Simpson wrote: > Note that you've already statically referred to action.SomeClass, so > it's already loaded, but not initialized, at least not by the reference to the class. -- Lew
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: RFC perfectjpattern new release 1.0.3 Next: using path hint in javax.jnlp's openFileDialog |