From: Mikhail Zotov on 18 Apr 2010 04:30 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Sylvain Robitaille <syl(a)alcor.concordia.ca> wrote: > Mikhail Zotov wrote: .... > > P.S. IMHO, recompiling Slackware `from scratch' can be an > > interesting exercise but will most likely be a waste of time. > > Unless the goal is to have Slackware running on an architecture for > which it is not officially available. Not every computer has an x86 > or x86_64 compatible CPU. Bravo, Sylvain. This is a point everybody else missed. -- Mikhail P.S. BTW, what are the chances the OP is interested to compile Slack for a device not compatible with x86*? ;-)
From: Loki Harfagr on 20 Apr 2010 03:11 Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:12:39 +0000, Sylvain Robitaille did cat : > Mikhail Zotov wrote: > >> P.S. BTW, what are the chances the OP is interested to compile Slack >> for a device not compatible with x86*? ;-) > > greater than zero ... but most certainly only for extremely small values of 'one' ;-)
From: Sylvain Robitaille on 19 Apr 2010 16:12 Mikhail Zotov wrote: > P.S. BTW, what are the chances the OP is interested to compile Slack > for a device not compatible with x86*? ;-) greater than zero ... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sylvain Robitaille syl(a)encs.concordia.ca Systems analyst / AITS Concordia University Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Montreal, Quebec, Canada ----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Grant on 20 Apr 2010 16:44
On 20 Apr 2010 07:11:03 GMT, Loki Harfagr <l0k1(a)thedarkdesign.free.fr.INVALID> wrote: >Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:12:39 +0000, Sylvain Robitaille did cat : > >> Mikhail Zotov wrote: >> >>> P.S. BTW, what are the chances the OP is interested to compile Slack >>> for a device not compatible with x86*? ;-) >> >> greater than zero ... > >but most certainly only for extremely small values of 'one' ;-) Reminds me of '2 + 2 = 5, for higher values of two' :o) Grant. -- http://bugs.id.au/ |