From: Scott Sauyet on 14 Jan 2010 15:23 On Jan 14, 2:53 pm, Jake Jarvis <pig_in_sh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: >> I collected the results at >> http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/1/ >> But I've done something screwy to IE on the page trying to be clever. >> If anyone can tell me why the generated links are not working properly >> in IE, I would love to know. > line 120: > > | var size = parseInt(cells[i].textContent, 10) || 1, > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > No such thing in mshtml D'OH. Self-administered dope-slap! I guess that's what I guess for throwing things together. Thank you very much. -- Scott
From: Scott Sauyet on 14 Jan 2010 15:25 On Jan 14, 3:23 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2:53 pm, Jake Jarvis <pig_in_sh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Scott Sauyet wrote: > >> I collected the results at > >> http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/1/ > >> But I've done something screwy to IE on the page trying to be clever. > >> If anyone can tell me why the generated links are not working properly > >> in IE, I would love to know. > > line 120: > > > | var size = parseInt(cells[i].textContent, 10) || 1, > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > No such thing in mshtml > > D'OH. Self-administered dope-slap! I guess that's what I guess for > throwing things together. Updated version: http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/2/ Thanks again, -- Scott
From: Jorge on 14 Jan 2010 15:40 On Jan 14, 9:25 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 3:23 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 14, 2:53 pm, Jake Jarvis <pig_in_sh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Scott Sauyet wrote: > > >> I collected the results at > > >> http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/1/ > > >> But I've done something screwy to IE on the page trying to be clever.. > > >> If anyone can tell me why the generated links are not working properly > > >> in IE, I would love to know. > > > line 120: > > > > | var size = parseInt(cells[i].textContent, 10) || 1, > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > No such thing in mshtml > > > D'OH. Self-administered dope-slap! I guess that's what I guess for > > throwing things together. > > Updated version: > > http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/2/ > > Thanks again, You can't compare a .push(value) with an [i]= value; ! -- Jorge.
From: Scott Sauyet on 14 Jan 2010 15:57 On Jan 14, 3:40 pm, Jorge <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 9:25 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Updated version: >> http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/2/ > > Thanks again, > > You can't compare a .push(value) with an [i]= value; ! Oh no? I believe I just did! :-) This was really a comparison of my solution to the original problem and Thomas Lahn's follow-up. I'm not trying to prove something in particular about what part of the algorithm is speedy or slow, only to see what differences in speed there are between them. -- Scott
From: Jorge on 14 Jan 2010 16:01
On Jan 14, 9:57 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 3:40 pm, Jorge <jo...(a)jorgechamorro.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 14, 9:25 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Updated version: > >> http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/LoopTimer/2/ > > > Thanks again, > > > You can't compare a .push(value) with an [i]= value; ! > > Oh no? I believe I just did! :-) > > This was really a comparison of my solution to the original problem > and Thomas Lahn's follow-up. > > I'm not trying to prove something in particular about what part of the > algorithm is speedy or slow, only to see what differences in speed > there are between them. Ok. But don't believe what Pointy said: "Make benchmarks then, and you will see that the simple post-decrement increases efficiency considerably as well", because it's not true. -- Jorge. |