From: Alexei Boulbitch on 10 Apr 2010 06:51 Hi, Jim, I am not quite sure that I've got your question right, but in case I did, execute this: (* Here it is assumed that your (stuff)=1 and your g(s,x)=exp(-x*s^2). This can be changed *) f1[x_] := 1 + \!\( \*SubsuperscriptBox[\(\[Integral]\), \(0\), \(1\)]\(Exp[\(-x\)* \*SuperscriptBox[\(s\), \(2\)]] \[DifferentialD]s\)\); or this f2[x_] := 1 + NIntegrate[Exp[-x*s^2], {s, 0, 1}]; You can then check f1[1] f2[1] 1 + 1/2 Sqrt[\[Pi]] Erf[1] 1.74682 or make graphs out of these functions. For instance, evaluate this: Plot[f2[x], {x, 0, 3}] Hope this helps. Alexei I have a certain integral, part of a larger expression, that can be expressed in terms of incomplete gamma functions by Mathematica. But in carrying out the definite integral and forcing it to be written in terms of gamma functions, this introduces branch points and other unnecessary complications. I want the integral left alone and evaluated numerically, but I still want to express the general formula for this large expression with the unevaluated integral in place. For example, I'd like f[x_] = (stuff) + int_{0}^{1} (g[s,x]) ds where the definite integral is expressed in the usual Mathematica notation. What I do *not* want Mathematica to do at this stage is to do the integral analytically and write it in terms of special functions. Instead, I just want to later make a list of values for f[x] and have the integral done numerically. How can I program this? Thanks, Jim -- Alexei Boulbitch, Dr., habil. Senior Scientist IEE S.A. ZAE Weiergewan 11, rue Edmond Reuter L-5326 Contern Luxembourg Phone: +352 2454 2566 Fax: +352 2454 3566 Website: www.iee.lu This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal from your system. Thank you for your co-operation.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Surprising behaviour with nested pure functions and local parameter Next: Symplify Table |