From: anant on 25 Jan 2010 00:47 Hi, I am doing an image compression project where in I need to find the wavelet coefficients of an image in the beginning. I need not only the wavelet decomposition but also the coefficient values after the decomposition. I searched the MATLAB help files found that by applying wavedec2 to an image and then finding the approximate and actual coefficients its possible. But I am not able to follow the procedure. So i would like to know if there is any easier method to this approach.
From: Rune Allnor on 25 Jan 2010 03:10 On 25 Jan, 06:47, "anant " <anan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I am doing an image compression project where in I need to find the wavelet coefficients of an image in the beginning. I need not only the wavelet decomposition but also the coefficient values after the decomposition. I searched the MATLAB help files found that by applying wavedec2 to an image and then finding the approximate and actual coefficients its possible. But I am not able to follow the procedure. So i would like to know if there is any easier method to this approach. Sure there is. Buy a piece of software that does the compression for you. A lot easier for you, but your boss or supervisor might not be too amused. Depending on the context of your project, that kind of approach might have a severe impact on your paycheck or grades. Nah, read up on the basics. Find a textbook and learn what wavelets are all about. Then look up the docs of whatever fuction you tried to use, and find out what you did wrong. Rune
From: Wayne King on 25 Jan 2010 06:16 "anant " <anantvu(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <hjjb8n$q80$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > Hi, I am doing an image compression project where in I need to find the wavelet coefficients of an image in the beginning. I need not only the wavelet decomposition but also the coefficient values after the decomposition. I searched the MATLAB help files found that by applying wavedec2 to an image and then finding the approximate and actual coefficients its possible. But I am not able to follow the procedure. So i would like to know if there is any easier method to this approach. Anant, I think you will need to clarify what you mean by "But I am not able to follow the procedure." Do you mean that you are not able to follow the procedure because you do not have the Wavelet Toolbox, or that you are not able to understand how the function works from the help documentation. Wayne
From: anant on 25 Jan 2010 14:19 HI Wayne, what i mean is that I am not able to understand the function which is given in help files. So it would be nice if i could write a simpler function by myself for this purpose.
From: Wayne King on 26 Jan 2010 12:45 "anant " <anantvu(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <hjkqr8$md9$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>... > HI Wayne, what i mean is that I am not able to understand the function which is given in help files. So it would be nice if i could write a simpler function by myself for this purpose. Hi Anant, just to give you an illustration for a simple wavelet filter, the Haar, let: x = [ 1 4 1 1; 1 1 1 1; 1 1 1 1; 1 1 1 1]; % First compute level-1 2D-DWT using the Haar in Matlab [cA,cH,cV,cD] = dwt2(x,'haar'); % Next let H = [1/sqrt(2) 1/sqrt(2) 0 0; 0 0 1/sqrt(2) 1/sqrt(2)]; G = [1/sqrt(2) -1/sqrt(2) 0 0; 0 0 1/sqrt(2) -1/sqrt(2)]; % Now look at ApproxCoeffs = H*x*H'; % compare the above to cA. Next compute VerticalDetails = H*x*G'; % compare the above to cV. Next compute HorizDetails = G*x*H'; %compare the above to cH. Finally, compute DiagDetails = G*x*G'; If you divide the matrix x into 2x2 block matrices C{1}=[1 4; 1 1]; C{2}=[1 1; 1 1]; C{3}=[1 1; 1 1]; C{4}= [1 1; 1 1]; You'll see that ApproxCoeffs is 2x2 matrix where the (1,1) element is proportional to the average of all the elements in C{1} and so on for the other blocks. Then look at VerticalDetails. The (1,1) element is proportional to the difference between the two columns of C{1} and so on for the other blocks. HorizDetails is the same as above except the differences are between the rows. DiagDetails-- the same as above except the differences are between elements on the diagonals. Hope that helps, Wayne
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: multiple boundary conditions for fmincon Next: Finding a certain row in matrix |