From: Landon on 15 Jul 2008 04:56 I have changed the CListBox type to CCheckListBox type but when I tried to DoModal the dialog with CListBox inside it, a runtime error occured. It was related with something of PreSubClassWindow( and when I change it back to CListBox, the dialog can be called well. What did I miss? Do I need to declare or initializing the CCheckListBox class? How to do that? Thank you.
From: Joseph M. Newcomer on 15 Jul 2008 09:36 Well, did you look at what the error was? Certainly, it was the ASSERT that said the listbox must be owner-draw, in which case the solution is obvious: make the listbox be owner-draw. You are expected to actually read the comments on the assertions. That's why the comments are there, and why you have a debugger. Of course, this presumes that you actually followed the instructions to enter the debugger... joe On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:56:03 -0700, Landon <Landon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >I have changed the CListBox type to CCheckListBox type but when I tried to >DoModal the dialog with CListBox inside it, a runtime error occured. > >It was related with something of PreSubClassWindow( and when I change it >back to CListBox, the dialog can be called well. > >What did I miss? Do I need to declare or initializing the CCheckListBox >class? > >How to do that? > >Thank you. Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] email: newcomer(a)flounder.com Web: http://www.flounder.com MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
From: Victor on 15 Jul 2008 09:39 Yes, Joe! You are, of course, right. But VC++6.0 does support LVS_EX_CHECKBOXES style and doesn't need any additional PSDK. Only "version 4.70 of the Common Controls" what means - Microsoft® Internet Explorer 3.x and higher. On the other hand, OP seems to not know what exactly his VC supports and what it doesn't. Regards, Victor "Joseph M. Newcomer" wrote: > It is often the case that when someone refers to "4.2" they are *really* referring to > MFC42.DLL, which was the name through VC6. > joe > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:04:03 +0200, "Victor" <nijegorodov.otpusk(a)freenet.de> wrote: > > >Hi, Joe! > >The most recent Platform SDK compatible with the VC++6.0 is from February > >2003. > >However, OP seems to use more older VC version: VC++4.2 ??? > > > >Victor > > > >"Joseph M. Newcomer" <newcomer(a)flounder.com> wrote in message > >news:dhtm74ddq5mglftmdsq7qvdp8c1cn39amv(a)4ax.com... > >> "Connected with"? What does that mean? > >> > >> If it is a separate program, it can be in any language you want, including > >> C# or VB. > >> > >> If it is going to be in a DLL (that is, it is not an "application" but a > >> "component"), you > >> can still write it in VS6; I have been using CCheckListBox for years. > >> > >> Note that you may be confusing the Platform SDK with the MFC library; they > >> are not the > >> same. You want the most recent Platform SDK that works with VS6 (I have a > >> vague memory it > >> is the one from October 2003, but I may have misremembered). > >> > >> But I know of no reason CCheckListBox should not work. > >> joe > >> > >> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:13:00 -0700, Landon > >> <Landon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > >>>I'm afraid I cannot do that because the this application will be connected > >>>with the old application developed with the 4.2. > >>> > >>>Any other ideas? > >>> > >>>Thank u. > >> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] > >> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com > >> Web: http://www.flounder.com > >> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm > > > Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] > email: newcomer(a)flounder.com > Web: http://www.flounder.com > MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm >
From: Joseph M. Newcomer on 15 Jul 2008 16:48 Note that in some cases the right #define must be set in stdafx.h; if the IE version is too low, those advanced features become undefined symbols. The treatment of the header files as "magic" is unfortunate; if I get an undefined symbol like this, the first thing I do is to see if I spelled it correctly, then make sure it is in a header file somewhere, and make sure I've included the header file. I will then make sure that it is not under some #if SOMEVER > 0xnnnn conditional. But too many people seem to be afraid to actually look any of this up. One of the most powerful tools available is find-in-files, and it should be an essential tool every programmer takes for granted. (Of course, one could question why something like "common controls" are coupled to the release of a *browser*, but it is already well-established that Microsoft was fundamentally clueless here) joe On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:39:02 -0700, Victor <Victor(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Yes, Joe! You are, of course, right. >But VC++6.0 does support LVS_EX_CHECKBOXES style and doesn't need any >additional PSDK. Only "version 4.70 of the Common Controls" what means - >Microsoft� Internet Explorer 3.x and higher. >On the other hand, OP seems to not know what exactly his VC supports and >what it doesn't. > >Regards, >Victor > >"Joseph M. Newcomer" wrote: > >> It is often the case that when someone refers to "4.2" they are *really* referring to >> MFC42.DLL, which was the name through VC6. >> joe >> >> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:04:03 +0200, "Victor" <nijegorodov.otpusk(a)freenet.de> wrote: >> >> >Hi, Joe! >> >The most recent Platform SDK compatible with the VC++6.0 is from February >> >2003. >> >However, OP seems to use more older VC version: VC++4.2 ??? >> > >> >Victor >> > >> >"Joseph M. Newcomer" <newcomer(a)flounder.com> wrote in message >> >news:dhtm74ddq5mglftmdsq7qvdp8c1cn39amv(a)4ax.com... >> >> "Connected with"? What does that mean? >> >> >> >> If it is a separate program, it can be in any language you want, including >> >> C# or VB. >> >> >> >> If it is going to be in a DLL (that is, it is not an "application" but a >> >> "component"), you >> >> can still write it in VS6; I have been using CCheckListBox for years. >> >> >> >> Note that you may be confusing the Platform SDK with the MFC library; they >> >> are not the >> >> same. You want the most recent Platform SDK that works with VS6 (I have a >> >> vague memory it >> >> is the one from October 2003, but I may have misremembered). >> >> >> >> But I know of no reason CCheckListBox should not work. >> >> joe >> >> >> >> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:13:00 -0700, Landon >> >> <Landon(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm afraid I cannot do that because the this application will be connected >> >>>with the old application developed with the 4.2. >> >>> >> >>>Any other ideas? >> >>> >> >>>Thank u. >> >> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] >> >> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com >> >> Web: http://www.flounder.com >> >> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm >> > >> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] >> email: newcomer(a)flounder.com >> Web: http://www.flounder.com >> MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm >> Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP] email: newcomer(a)flounder.com Web: http://www.flounder.com MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
From: Landon on 15 Jul 2008 20:47 Yes, you were right and I have checked the properties and now it is working fine. At first, I did not know what error it was. Then I find it and I realize that I must do something with the control's properties. Thank you very much.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Get MFCGridCtrl's Cell Text via sendmessage API? Next: CMFCOutlookBar |