Prev: The trim function and it's intented purpose?
Next: CHR 2010: Final call for papers
From: Richard Heathfield on 30 Mar 2010 02:16
mike3 wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2:02 am, Richard Heathfield <r...(a)see.sig.invalid> wrote:
>> mike3 wrote:
> <snp>
>> Why? Why not just connect to the nearest *unattached* point, reserving 1
>> for last?
>>
>
> Yes. I should've mentioned that obvious qualifier.

In which case you don't have a problem.

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line vacant - apply within
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: The trim function and it's intented purpose?
Next: CHR 2010: Final call for papers