How to save a utube video
in [Computers]
|
Prev: #$%#@## True Image
Next: Suitable Motherboard?
From: Vari L. Cinicke on 29 Nov 2006 14:58 arnab.z(a)gmail wrote: > arnab.z(a)gmail wrote: >> drew wrote: >>> RuPEDski wrote: >>>>>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? How >>>>>>> would you like to proceed? >>>>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? How >>>>>> would you like to proceed? >>>>>> >>>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? How >>>>> would you like to proceed? >>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? How >>>> would you like to proceed? >>> I think there is a disorder called echolalia but I think it applies to >>> repeated phrases spoken, not written. >>> >> Echographia, then? >> >> AFAIK, I just coined it. Thank you. :-) > > Grr... they already have it, with a different meaning: > > echographia > Type: Term > > Pronunciation: ek'o-graf'e-a > > Definitions: > 1. A form of agraphia in which one cannot write spontaneously but can > write from dictation or copy. > Don't feel bad. Here is an alternative: graphomania -- A mania for writing. So graphomaniac, one who has graphomania. The graphomaniac is defined [by Max Nordau] as a being �with an insatiable desire to write, though he has nothing to write about except his own mental and moral ailments�. Wish Rupedski would contract graphospasm. Would be far better for rst. -- Cheers, vc
From: RuPEDski on 29 Nov 2006 19:17 <pedrodias(a)snip.net> wrote in message news:1164826487.645541.312760(a)n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... > > RuPEDski wrote: >> <pedrodias(a)snip.net> wrote in message >> news:1164811403.089202.90070(a)h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> > >> > RuPEDski wrote: >> >> "RuPEDski" <datacipher(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:7O1bh.382680$1T2.235309(a)pd7urf2no... >> >> > >> >> > "RuPEDski" <datacipher(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> > news:%4%ah.381728$1T2.191527(a)pd7urf2no... >> >> >> >> >> >> "RuPEDski" <datacipher(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >> news:ySSah.380595$1T2.6574(a)pd7urf2no... >> >> >>> >> >> >>> "RuPEDski" <datacipher(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>> news:Lkyah.380991$5R2.19720(a)pd7urf3no... >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> "RuPEDski" <datacipher(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>> news:KZnah.378396$5R2.173697(a)pd7urf3no... >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> <pedrodias(a)snip.net> wrote in message >> >> >>>>> news:1164554257.206584.316490(a)h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> RuPEDski wrote: >> >> >>>>>>> Thinking about it Pedro, there is no way Arnab has the courage >> >> >>>>>>> nor >> >> >>>>>>> do I >> >> >>>>>>> think he lives in North America. YOU on the other hand, do not >> >> >>>>>>> live >> >> >>>>>>> particularly far, AND you have spewed numerous profane insults >> >> >>>>>>> and >> >> >>>>>>> said that >> >> >>>>>>> you dont' "sugar coat" the fact that you have a great deal of >> >> >>>>>>> rage >> >> >>>>>>> and >> >> >>>>>>> resentment toward me. Would you care to fight? In all >> >> >>>>>>> seriousness, >> >> >>>>>>> it could >> >> >>>>>>> be quite an interesting experiment and release. I suggest it >> >> >>>>>>> would >> >> >>>>>>> be more >> >> >>>>>>> productive and more honorable than simply posting your >> >> >>>>>>> repeated >> >> >>>>>>> childish >> >> >>>>>>> insults. It's kind of exciting don't you think? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Harrumphing on UseNet? Not very. But you know where to reach >> >> >>>>>> me. >> >> >>>>>> Feel >> >> >>>>>> free. Spent seven years getting batted around by speeding >> >> >>>>>> buses, >> >> >>>>>> not >> >> >>>>>> likely you'll pose much of a worry. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach >> >> >>>>> me"? >> >> >>>>> How would you like to proceed? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach >> >> >>>> me"? >> >> >>>> How >> >> >>>> would you like to proceed? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach >> >> >>> me"? >> >> >>> How >> >> >>> would you like to proceed? >> >> >> >> >> >> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? >> >> >> How >> >> >> would you like to proceed? >> >> > >> >> > OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? >> >> > How >> >> > would you like to proceed? >> >> >> >> OK, sounds good. What do you mean, by "you know where to reach me"? >> >> How >> >> would you like to proceed? >> > >> > This is funny. I hadn't even checked this thread in days, figured you >> > had the intelligence for *this* last, tiny tiny step. Looks like I >> > managed to overestimate you, impossible as that may seem. >> >> Um. No. I wanted to do this in a mutual way as I suggested above. You did >> seem to imply you simply want me to show up at your house, I don't think >> that's a good idea and I'm not sure why you want that. > > *Contact* information, dimwit! > > I feel stupid enough doing this in public. Heck, I *am* damn stupid to > even engage you in the first place. Character flaw. > >> > To put it in ways that even you might understand (I pray - hard to know >> > anymore): you know my name, you know where I live and work, you have my >> > actual e-mail in the header of every one of my posts (and you do seem >> > to read a lot of them, which is flattering, if a little creepy), my >> > address and phone number are listed - no way am I actually going to >> > post them: there are limits. >> >> You've got to be kidding! I avoid your posts and I don't know where you >> live >> or work except that it's on the east coast and you do a menial job. That >> came up in direct conversation. > > Funny, I don't post much, and you respond to a disproportionate > fraction of them. > > And wrong on the rest. I did include all the information on that > exchange. > > Look, *I* have no info at *all* on you, and I'm *done* looking like an > idiot in public. If you want to be stupid, I'm willing, but it will > have to be in private. > > Not doing this on Usenet. Up to you, next. Yes, exactly. We are agreed. So, let's set up a meeting. No more frivolous discussion. Let us meet in middle America.
From: Whisper on 1 Dec 2006 05:32
RuPEDski wrote: >> >>Look, *I* have no info at *all* on you, and I'm *done* looking like an >>idiot in public. If you want to be stupid, I'm willing, but it will >>have to be in private. >> >>Not doing this on Usenet. Up to you, next. > > > Yes, exactly. We are agreed. So, let's set up a meeting. No more frivolous > discussion. Let us meet in middle America. > > Given this is a youtube thread could you guys record this encounter & post it on youtube? Maybe Eric can edit the highlights? Might be a worldwide hit & inject interest into the sport - 15 minutes of fame for you guys? |