From: Benj on
On May 15, 6:23 am, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 14 May, 19:38, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> > CLEANTECHNICA: Humans Won't Survive on Half of Earth by 2300
> > Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> > already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won't suddenly stop rising
> > in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> > the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
>
> >http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=humans-wont-survive-....

Be sure to check all the "denier" comments after this propaganda
piece! Nobody supports this embarrassment to science by the National
Academy of Sciences. It's what happens when politics takes over
science.

> Wow, this is really wacky stuff, predicting 300 years ahead, lol.

Aren't you scared yet? You'd better be! We can all only be saved by
each month taking an amount of money equal to our electric bills and
sending it to the "Cap and Trade" Exchange in Chicago to be run by
"Wormley's" bosses.

And don't forget by now we are all supposed to have personal home
robots making the bed and washing the dishes. I read it in some other
"study" a few years ago.

The shame of "Wormley" and his pals is that Scientific American is
widely regarded as a credible source for "science" in public education
and this nonsense will be widely used to indoctrinate school kids. All
we need next is some "study" by Bellesiles "proving" that crime can be
eliminated by restricting firearms to those in power and their sworn
agents.


From: troll on
On May 14, 11:38 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> CLEANTECHNICA: Humans Won't Survive on Half of Earth by 2300
> Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won't suddenly stop rising
> in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=humans-wont-survive-....
>
> Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won’t suddenly stop rising
> in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Up to half of the
> planet would become uninhabitable by the 2300s with an average global
> temperature rise of 21.6 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> This would make much larger regions into uninhabitable deserts than now.
> Humans would not be able to adapt or survive in such conditions.
>
> “If this happens, our current worries about sea level rise, occasional
> heat waves and bushfires, biodiversity loss and agricultural
> difficulties will pale into insignificance beside a major threat – as
> much as half the currently inhabited globe may simply become too hot for
> people to live there,” said Professor Tony McMichael, one of the authors.

I have seen a lot of estimates of the world's climate
during the past ice age and there were a lot of
deserts between the quasi tropical areas and the
small temperate belt that existed until one went
northward enough to enter the zone covered with
glaciers.

I think a warmer Earth will be a better Earth.
More water will evaporate from the Earth's oceans
and so there will be more rain in the tropics and
the temperate areas. There will be a longer growing
season in the farther north, and the increased
carbon dioxide will have a fertilizing effect on
the cooler area adapted temperate C3 plants.

Supposedly the dinosaurs lived with much
greater levels of CO2 and did quite well.

There were large numbers of wholly mammoth
and saber toothed tigers wandering around,
and there was no agriculture until only a blink
of an eye in terms of geologic history only
a short while ago. The Earth has already
been modified.

Trillions and trillions of human beings can
potentially make the Earth a bad place
to live for each individual human being
living on it. The infinitely reproducing
hoards in the developing countries have
about as much regard for the Earth
as a person spending all day in a
traffic jam on the highway.
From: Giga2 on
On 15 May, 12:38, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote:
> On May 15, 6:23 am, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On 14 May, 19:38, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > CLEANTECHNICA: Humans Won't Survive on Half of Earth by 2300
> > > Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> > > already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won't suddenly stop rising
> > > in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> > > the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
>
> > >http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=humans-wont-survive-...
>
> Be sure to check all the "denier" comments after this propaganda
> piece!  Nobody supports this embarrassment to science by the National
> Academy of Sciences. It's what happens when politics takes over
> science.
>
> > Wow, this is really wacky stuff, predicting 300 years ahead, lol.
>
> Aren't you scared yet?  You'd better be!  We can all only be saved by
> each month taking an amount of money equal to our electric bills and
> sending it to the "Cap and Trade" Exchange in Chicago to be run by
> "Wormley's" bosses.
>
> And don't forget by now we are all supposed to have personal home
> robots making the bed and washing the dishes. I read it in some other
> "study" a few years ago.
>
> The shame of "Wormley" and his pals is that Scientific American is
> widely regarded as a credible source for "science" in public education
> and this nonsense will be widely used to indoctrinate school kids. All
> we need next is some "study" by Bellesiles "proving" that crime can be
> eliminated by restricting firearms to those in power and their sworn
> agents.

Its really almost beyond belief, 300 years! Its like saying someone
fighting the English civil war could have predicted a black man would
be US president in 2009. This isn't science as much as people making
fools of themselves, in public, like academic lemmings.
From: tadchem on
On May 14, 2:38 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> CLEANTECHNICA: Humans Won't Survive on Half of Earth by 2300

Right now only 29.2% is habitable, so an INCREASE to 50% would be a
relative change of +71% - terriffic!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080310092749AAgnaDs

When can I get my gills?

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

From: Catoni on
On May 14, 2:38 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> CLEANTECHNICA: Humans Won't Survive on Half of Earth by 2300
> Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won't suddenly stop rising
> in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=humans-wont-survive-....
>
> Average global temperatures, that have been rising for a century
> already, due to anthropogenic climate change, won’t suddenly stop rising
> in 2100, say Australian and US scientists in a study just published in
> the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Up to half of the
> planet would become uninhabitable by the 2300s with an average global
> temperature rise of 21.6 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> This would make much larger regions into uninhabitable deserts than now.
> Humans would not be able to adapt or survive in such conditions.
>
> “If this happens, our current worries about sea level rise, occasional
> heat waves and bushfires, biodiversity loss and agricultural
> difficulties will pale into insignificance beside a major threat – as
> much as half the currently inhabited globe may simply become too hot for
> people to live there,” said Professor Tony McMichael, one of the authors.

No problem ! By then we will have discovered power sources for
interstellar space travel, or ways to travel many light years
instantaneously, and we will be able to migrate to other worlds.