Hummingbird SOCKS 8.0
in [Freeware]
|
From: za kAT on 29 May 2010 07:48 "Hummingbird SOCKS 8.0 Description "Hummingbird SOCKS Client supports both SOCKS V4 and V5." Brothersoft Editor: SOCKS is a proxy mechanism that allows client PCs to gain full access to hosts outside their local network while providing a high degree of security for the local network. From its earliest implementation, SOCKS has been considered to be primarily a firewall, protecting local networks from unauthorized access from outside the network. The Hummingbird SOCKS Client works in conjunction with SOCKS V4/V5 servers. When a SOCKS client application makes a request to a host outside the local network, the request is redirected to the SOCKS server. The SOCKS server authenticates the user, authorizes the request, establishes a proxy connection, and then transparently passes data Between the inside host and the outside host. There are two major versions of SOCKS: SOCKS V4 and SOCKS V5. Hummingbird SOCKS Client supports both SOCKS V4 and V5 for Windows NT/2000 and Windows 95/98/ME. You can free download Hummingbird SOCKS 8.0 now." http://www.brothersoft.com/hummingbird-socks-download-192881.html Are they being phased out? -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Mitzi Beesley on 30 May 2010 07:36 "za kAT" <zakAT(a)super-secret-IPaddress.82.5.94.219> wrote: >"Hummingbird SOCKS 8.0 Description > >"Hummingbird SOCKS Client supports both SOCKS V4 and V5." >Brothersoft Editor: SOCKS is a proxy mechanism that allows client PCs >to gain full access to hosts outside their local network while >providing a high degree of security for the local network. From its >earliest implementation, SOCKS has been considered to be primarily a >firewall, protecting local networks from unauthorized access from >outside the network. blah blah blah..." > >http://www.brothersoft.com/hummingbird-socks-download-192881.html That's fantastic! Good find :-) Try this one too. It's not as professional but from a socialist, it's the best that can be expected: <http://aracari.redirectme.net:8080\ACF%20stuff\john_stubbings_socks.html> --
From: za kAT on 30 May 2010 08:43 On Sun, 30 May 2010 13:36:27 +0200, Mitzi Beesley wrote: > Try this one too. It's not as professional but from a socialist, it's > the best that can be expected: Are the winnets that cling to your backside socialists? -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
From: Mitzi Beesley on 31 May 2010 02:04 "za kAT" <za...(a)super-secret-IPaddress.82.5.94.219> wrote: >"Are the winnets that cling to your backside socialists?" I dunno much about socialism, it's a mental disease ain't it? But I found this on an English newspaper yesterday: "It is the case that many people - often with good, but innocent, intentions - support socialist ideals without always realising what it invariably leads to. It is vehemently anti-liberty and as I said earlier, socialism is akin to a religion: its True Believers coerce people into subjugating themselves to its belief system and when that doesn't work it becomes progressively more dictatorial and fascist. Secret police, disappearances and all the rest of it. Those at the top of the social pile are hit first: the intelletuals, educated, free thinkers etc because they represent the greatest risk to socialism which demands total control and obediance. That is what happened in all of the countries I listed. The explanation is simple: they wish to remake society in their own image and quickly realise that this can only be done by destroying the existing society they inherit. Destruction begins slowly at first, then gathers momentum. Think of Pol Pot and Year Zero - everything before year zero was to be wiped out and replaced by a new model of society in his image. The killing fields were the result. Among others, Chairman Mao slaughtered 'the spectacled ones' because they were usually the most educated and capable of seeing through the sham ideology. Scapegoats are always identified to blame for all of the nation's ills and to justify the ruthless cleansing that happens. It is invariably true that people who subscribe to socialism (and other mass movements) are those in life who feel poorly about themselves, feel like failures and have never achieved in life what they feel entitled to. This creates a sense of jealousy and dislike towards successful people which can verge on hatred. Along comes socialism which provides the opportunity for revenge and settling of old scores by wealth redistribution etc. In the UK, look at the hatred in the faces and words of most trade union bosses against the companies they operate in. A principal aim of socialism is to destroy economies to make people dependent on the state." --
From: za kAT on 31 May 2010 04:57 On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:04:35 +0200, Mitzi Beesley wrote: > "za kAT" <za...(a)super-secret-IPaddress.82.5.94.219> wrote: >>"Are the winnets that cling to your backside socialists?" > > I dunno much about socialism, it's a mental disease ain't it? No, you have a mental disease. Socialism appears to be anything you choose it to be, and socialists to be anyone who points out, you are a nutter. > But I found this on an English newspaper yesterday: Was it wrapped around your fish n' chips? Did you get all frothy and worked up as you read it, forcing oily cod down your gullet, and getting it all over your little toothbrush moustache? -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat - Sergeant Tech-Com, DN38416. Assigned to protect you. You've been targeted for denigration!
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Dexpot anyone? Next: alt.comp.freeware links at Sat May 29 21:20:02 2010 |