From: Hans on 12 Aug 2010 00:03 When trying to solve a differential equation in Mathematica I got Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge about hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe some Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is possible to turn this output into a 'normal' equation and if so how this can be done? Thanks, Hans
From: Torsten Hennig on 12 Aug 2010 00:12 > When trying to solve a differential equation in > Mathematica I got > > Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), > 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] > > as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge about > hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe some > Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is possible to > turn this output into a 'normal' equation and if so > how this can be done? > > Thanks, > > Hans http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric2F1/02/01/ Best wishes Torsten.
From: Torsten Hennig on 12 Aug 2010 00:17 > > When trying to solve a differential equation in > > Mathematica I got > > > > Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), > > 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] > > > > as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge about > > hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe some > > Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is possible > to > > turn this output into a 'normal' equation and if > so > > how this can be done? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hans > > http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/H > ypergeometric2F1/02/01/ > > Best wishes > Torsten. According to this definition, it seems that your function can be simplified to f(t) = rho/A/(rho/A-1)* exp(-exp(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA) Best wishes Torsten.
From: Torsten Hennig on 12 Aug 2010 00:28 > > > When trying to solve a differential equation in > > > Mathematica I got > > > > > > Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), > > > 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] > > > > > > as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge > about > > > hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe > some > > > Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is > possible > > to > > > turn this output into a 'normal' equation and if > > so > > > how this can be done? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Hans > > > > > http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/H > > > ypergeometric2F1/02/01/ > > > > Best wishes > > Torsten. > > According to this definition, it seems that your > function can be simplified to > f(t) = rho/A/(rho/A-1)* > exp(-exp(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA) > > Best wishes > Torsten. No, sorry, (a)_k, (b)_k and (c)_k also depend on k. So it doesn't seem possible to write the infinite sum in an easier way. Best wishes Torsten.
From: mjc on 12 Aug 2010 16:53 On Aug 12, 1:28 am, Torsten Hennig <Torsten.Hen...(a)umsicht.fhg.de> wrote: > > > > When trying to solve a differential equation in > > > > Mathematica I got > > > > > Hypergeometric2F1[1,-(rho/A), > > > > 1-(rho/A),-e^(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA] > > > > > as an output. Unfortunately I lack knowledge > > about > > > > hypergeometric functions. Can anybody (maybe > > some > > > > Mathematica Guru's) tell me whether it is > > possible > > > to > > > > turn this output into a 'normal' equation and if > > > so > > > > how this can be done? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Hans > > >http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/H > > > > ypergeometric2F1/02/01/ > > > > Best wishes > > > Torsten. > > > According to this definition, it seems that your > > function can be simplified to > > f(t) = rho/A/(rho/A-1)* > > exp(-exp(A*t-C[1])*epsilon*lambdaA) > > > Best wishes > > Torsten. > > No, sorry, (a)_k, (b)_k and (c)_k also depend on k. > So it doesn't seem possible to write the infinite sum > in an easier way. > > Best wishes > Torsten. What was the DE you wanted to solve?
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Boolean Boogie Next: Arithmetic Coder Probability Model $100 |