From: The Central Scrutinizer on 11 Feb 2010 01:24 "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:op.u7wmceo1a3w0dxdave(a)hodgins.homeip.net... > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:48:55 -0500, The Central Scrutinizer > <gcisko(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> I am saying you appear to be a whacky nut-job that thinks MS is incapable >> of >> having an AV product because of who they are. > > Your a new poster here. Every once in a while, some m$ paid patsy > shows up to claim their software is good, and I suspect you are > another silly m$ employee. Are you serious? >> Hey pal I am the central scrutinizer not you OK. I'll tell you what >> to trim and what not to trim. You dig? > > You're also obviously new to usenet Sure I have been posting to usenet since the late 1980's early 1990's. DORK. > Eventually, I expect you'll learn to trim your articles, of you'll > find yourself plonked by all of the regular posters here. Sure, > M$ has purchased another anti virus application. I expect, within > a year or two, they will give up trying to maintain it, just like > they did before, with MSAV. religious psycho babble. > I've gotten so frustrated trying to maintain systems where the > fools who designed them made the mistake of using M$ software, > that, yes, I really dislike the company. Uh oh... religious psycho babble. > For you to call me an idiot for blaming m$ for producing crapware, > instead of good software, just shows who the real idiot is. Sure... religious psycho babble. > I find it amusing, that you are afraid to use your real name. Are you serious with that??? > I'm laughing at your silly reply. Yeah me too... > Dave Hodgins > > -- > Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email. > (nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for > use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
From: The Central Scrutinizer on 11 Feb 2010 01:26 Absolutely. Please do what you must... "Buffalo" <Eric(a)nada.com.invalid> wrote in message news:hkvdae$mab$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > The Central Scrutinizer wrote: > [snip] >> Hey pal I am the central scrutinizer not you OK. I'll tell you what >> to trim and what not to trim. You dig? > > You truely sound like an ignorant, but arrogant, idiot. > Buffalo > >
From: Bill on 17 Feb 2010 23:38 X-No-Archive: Yes In article <d8f789ef-be90-49ed-b515-9fdfae5a7568(a)o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Michael says... > >About 6 days ago my avast AV that I had used for years suddenly >refused to connect me to its update server. I guess when it comes to anti-virus, like anything else, you get what you pay for. That is why I don't use free anti-virus software.
From: Bill on 18 Feb 2010 07:56 In article <62aqn5lf9ujc49j2n3vstlqhoq1gub6d8e(a)4ax.com>, FredW says... >That is a often repeated misunderstanding (or prejudice ?). > >Many, many people (millions of users) use Avira Antivir, Avast or AVG >(all free products) to their complete satisfaction and never have a >problem. > >And did you notice Microsoft Security Essentials, which is another >*free* anti-virus solution, this time from Microsoft. Yes, millions do. But it's not prejudice or a misunderstanding. I look at it this way. If I am using something for free, if it doesn't update I have nothing to complain about. It was free. But if I am using a paid product, the software company is more likely to ensure that I get those updates when I'm supposed to.
From: Bill on 18 Feb 2010 08:52
X-No-Archive: Yes In article <d7fqn5dj0f84i6l64d85sm087gatsvl3q6(a)4ax.com>, FredW says... >I understand your view is "a few years old". Yeah, well. So am I. And I failed to mention, the primary reason that I don't use free anti-virus is that NOD32 isn't free. |