Prev: I bet no one knows enough to answer THIS question... !
Next: Fuji SLR forum on Dpreview is dying
From: Scott W on 15 Jul 2010 12:09 On Jul 15, 2:42 am, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > "Scotius" <yodas...(a)mnsi.net> wrote in message > > news:fsms369k0lm01f67vj3at5odi4pmhljdh7(a)4ax.com... > > > Why is it that camera lenses are round, but pictures are > > square? Hmmm? Tell me that ya' smarteys! > > It's because trees are round which is what we use to make paper, > but the paper we print them on is square (or rectangle). > It's a government conspiracy that's been going on since the dawn of > photography. You could make a square lens, but then you would need to take round photos and that would be a pain. Scott
From: SneakyP on 17 Jul 2010 00:34 Scott W <biphoto(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:276670d7-07e3-4865-9d39- ee5541e7db3b(a)u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > On Jul 15, 2:42�am, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "Scotius" <yodas...(a)mnsi.net> wrote in message >> >> news:fsms369k0lm01f67vj3at5odi4pmhljdh7(a)4ax.com... >> >> > Why is it that camera lenses are round, but pictures are >> > square? Hmmm? Tell me that ya' smarteys! >> >> It's because trees are round which is what we use to make paper, >> but the paper we print them on is square (or rectangle). >> It's a �government conspiracy that's been going on since the dawn of >> photography. > > You could make a square lens, but then you would need to take round > photos and that would be a pain. > Even worse when considering there are no round paper printers with round papers, round photo processors or even curved & rounded monitors. Maybe our eyes are round balls for a reason. How about that for a Pi in your eye? (Pi = 3.14159.....) Pun intended. -- SneakyP To email me, you know what to do.
From: DanP on 17 Jul 2010 03:11 On Jul 17, 5:34 am, SneakyP <48umof...(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: > Scott W <biph...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:276670d7-07e3-4865-9d39- > ee5541e7d...(a)u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 2:42 am, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> "Scotius" <yodas...(a)mnsi.net> wrote in message > > >>news:fsms369k0lm01f67vj3at5odi4pmhljdh7(a)4ax.com... > > >> > Why is it that camera lenses are round, but pictures are > >> > square? Hmmm? Tell me that ya' smarteys! > > >> It's because trees are round which is what we use to make paper, > >> but the paper we print them on is square (or rectangle). > >> It's a government conspiracy that's been going on since the dawn of > >> photography. > > > You could make a square lens, but then you would need to take round > > photos and that would be a pain. > > Even worse when considering there are no round paper printers with round > papers, round photo processors or even curved & rounded monitors. Maybe > our eyes are round balls for a reason. > You are on to something here, a curved sensor (spherical) will sort out the distortions at wide angles. DanP
From: Peter on 17 Jul 2010 20:57 "SneakyP" <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9DB7EEE51904248umofa02sneakemailc(a)127.0.0.1... > Scott W <biphoto(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:276670d7-07e3-4865-9d39- > ee5541e7db3b(a)u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: > >> On Jul 15, 2:42 am, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >>> "Scotius" <yodas...(a)mnsi.net> wrote in message >>> >>> news:fsms369k0lm01f67vj3at5odi4pmhljdh7(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> > Why is it that camera lenses are round, but pictures are >>> > square? Hmmm? Tell me that ya' smarteys! >>> >>> It's because trees are round which is what we use to make paper, >>> but the paper we print them on is square (or rectangle). >>> It's a government conspiracy that's been going on since the dawn of >>> photography. >> >> You could make a square lens, but then you would need to take round >> photos and that would be a pain. >> > > Even worse when considering there are no round paper printers with round > papers, round photo processors or even curved & rounded monitors. Maybe > our eyes are round balls for a reason. > > How about that for a Pi in your eye? > > (Pi = 3.14159.....) > Pun intended. Ask Sir Conference -- Peter
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on 17 Jul 2010 17:08 SneakyP <48umofa02(a)WHITELISTONLYsneakemail.com> wrote: > Even worse when considering there are no round paper printers with round > papers, round photo processors or even curved & rounded monitors. Well, there used to be a number of circular ... monitors[1]. Even the usable area of a circular sensor glass is used to describe the chip sizes of P&S cameras today ... -Wolfgang [1] Radar screens, for example.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: I bet no one knows enough to answer THIS question... ! Next: Fuji SLR forum on Dpreview is dying |