I couldn't getg Chris's links to work at all
in [UK Mac]
|
Prev: Safari 5.0 v Firefox 3.6.3
Next: Printing A5 booklets
From: James Jolley on 9 Jun 2010 16:24 On 2010-06-09 21:13:54 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: > On 2010-06-09 21:05:33 +0100, James Jolley said: > >> I'm not sure what's going on there, but both your private eye links >> refused to work with VO. All I got was "Private Eye Logo", just the one >> link and nothing. I'll have a look at the official site then. > > They did take quite a long time to display here. There are several > things coming from a.unanimis.co.uk that take many seconds to appear, > it takes maybe 20 - 30 seconds in total for the page loading spinner to > stop? > > Coincidentally, the Reader button appears for both articles once they > finish arriving. As I posted to an earlier reply, the web design seems terrible, but it's probably not common to have the blind read the paper. I wonder how it's readership compares to the dailies?
From: Chris Ridd on 9 Jun 2010 16:48 On 2010-06-09 21:24:03 +0100, James Jolley said: > On 2010-06-09 21:13:54 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: > >> On 2010-06-09 21:05:33 +0100, James Jolley said: >> >>> I'm not sure what's going on there, but both your private eye links >>> refused to work with VO. All I got was "Private Eye Logo", just the one >>> link and nothing. I'll have a look at the official site then. >> >> They did take quite a long time to display here. There are several >> things coming from a.unanimis.co.uk that take many seconds to appear, >> it takes maybe 20 - 30 seconds in total for the page loading spinner to >> stop? >> >> Coincidentally, the Reader button appears for both articles once they >> finish arriving. > > As I posted to an earlier reply, the web design seems terrible, but > it's probably not common to have the blind read the paper. I wonder > how it's readership compares to the dailies? The printed magazine is pretty badly designed as well, so that's not too surprising. You could always write to them and see if they can improve the site? I get the impression it is an effort from a very small group of people, so you might get some good results. -- Chris
From: James Jolley on 9 Jun 2010 16:58
On 2010-06-09 21:48:31 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: > On 2010-06-09 21:24:03 +0100, James Jolley said: > >> On 2010-06-09 21:13:54 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: >> >>> On 2010-06-09 21:05:33 +0100, James Jolley said: >>> >>>> I'm not sure what's going on there, but both your private eye links >>>> refused to work with VO. All I got was "Private Eye Logo", just the one >>>> link and nothing. I'll have a look at the official site then. >>> >>> They did take quite a long time to display here. There are several >>> things coming from a.unanimis.co.uk that take many seconds to appear, >>> it takes maybe 20 - 30 seconds in total for the page loading spinner to >>> stop? >>> >>> Coincidentally, the Reader button appears for both articles once they >>> finish arriving. >> >> As I posted to an earlier reply, the web design seems terrible, but >> it's probably not common to have the blind read the paper. I wonder >> how it's readership compares to the dailies? > > The printed magazine is pretty badly designed as well, so that's not > too surprising. You could always write to them and see if they can > improve the site? I get the impression it is an effort from a very > small group of people, so you might get some good results. Might give that a go then. It's always a bit difficult knowing when to jump in. You don't want to come over a whiner and all that do you? |